Core-002

核心002

• 批准号: 10613555
• 负责人: JAMES E. HEUBI
• 金额: $ 105.65万
• 依托单位: UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2015
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2015-08-14 至 2025-03-31
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/10613555
• 关键词: Address; Biological Sciences; Clinical Sciences; Collaborations; Communities; Consultations; Development; Discipline; Dissemination and Implementation; Education; Educational workshop; Effectiveness; Face; Funding; Grant; Health; Health Priorities; Healthcare Systems; Infrastructure; Institution; Interdisciplinary Study; Leadership; Learning; National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; Nature; Outcome; Process; Publishing; Reporting; Research; Research Personnel; Role; Science; Training; Training Programs; Translational Research; Universities; Work; Writing; clinical center; college; community engaged research; community engagement; improved; innovation; knowledge integration; learning community; multidisciplinary; programs; translational pipeline; working group

Engaging stakeholders throughout the full spectrum of the research process leads to better science and, ultimately, better health outcomes. Yet, the 2014 National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) Advisory Council Working Group Report found 1) a paucity of community-driven research; and 2) that CTSA hubs lack sufficient infrastructure to support the science of community engagement. The Community Engagement Core (CEC) includes a portfolio of innovative programs and collaborations that demonstrate the benefits of engaging communities as active partners in research to addresses health priorities. We have worked to build capacity in the community-engaged research workforce via training, networking, and grants. Finally, the CEC has consulted with investigators and community stakeholders to optimize research processes and worked with other CCTST Cores and CTSA hubs to facilitate dissemination and implementation of best practices. In the Life Sciences, over 90% of published research is by two or more authors (1). The complexity of the problems studied requires integration of knowledge from many disciplines and the ability to develop and maintain effective teams. The siloed nature of universities and research institutions is partly responsible for challenges investigators face when trying to find collaborators from other disciplines. Our Center for Improvement Science (CIS) has taken a leadership role in developing mechanisms to build broad networks across disciplines, colleges, institutions, and the community. Our initial cross-disciplinary network has resulted in over $6 million in funding for interprofessional research and practice improvement projects. The CIS has also implemented a multi-level team science training program that includes basic to advanced workshops, a graduate-level course on Collaboration and Team Science, and Grand Rounds. In addition, we provide consultations for creating teams, improving teams and writing team-based grants. Finally, our expertise in quality improvement has built bridges between academic and health care systems to form a Learning Health Care System. We will build on our successful track record in community engagement and team science to: Aim 1: Further infuse community engagement within the CCTST and across the translational spectrum; Aim 2: Increase capacity for bi-directional engagement through expansion of educational offerings in community engagement and team science in translational research; Aim 3: Facilitate the development of multidisciplinary Learning Communities (LCs) that support the dissemination and implementation of best practices in community engagement and team science; and Aim 4: Implement an innovative team science program to enhance the effectiveness of multidisciplinary research teams.

吸引利益相关者在整个研究过程中都会带来更好的科学，并 最终，更好的健康状况。然而，2014年国家前进科学中心 （NCATS）咨询委员会工作组报告发现1）缺乏社区驱动的研究； 2） CTSA枢纽缺乏足够的基础设施来支持社区参与的科学。社区 参与核心（CEC）包括创新计划和合作的投资组合，以证明 将社区作为积极合作伙伴参与研究的好处，以解决健康的重点。我们有 通过培训，网络和补助金来在社区参与研究人员中建立能力。 最后，CEC已与调查人员和社区利益相关者进行了咨询，以优化研究过程 并与其他CCTST核心和CTSA枢纽合作，以促进传播和实施最佳 实践。在生命科学中，超过90％的发表研究是由两位或多个作者（1）。复杂性 研究的问题需要从许多学科中整合知识以及发展和发展的能力 保持有效的团队。大学和研究机构的孤立性质是部分原因 挑战调查人员试图从其他学科中找到合作者时面临的挑战。我们的中心 改进科学（CIS）在开发建立广泛网络的机制方面发挥了领导作用 跨学科，学院，机构和社区。我们最初的跨学科网络已导致 在跨专业研究和实践改进项目的资金中超过600万美元。顺式有 还实施了一个多级团队科学培训计划，其中包括基本和高级研讨会， 研究生级的合作与团队科学课程以及大回合。此外，我们提供 为创建团队，改善团队和撰写基于团队的赠款的咨询。最后，我们的专业知识 质量改善已在学术和医疗保健系统之间建立了桥梁，以形成学习健康 护理系统。我们将以我们在社区参与和团队科学方面的成功记录为基础： 目的1：进一步注入CCTST和整个翻译范围内的社区参与； 目标2：通过扩大教育产品的扩展，提高双向参与的能力 转化研究中的社区参与和团队科学； 目的3：促进支持多学科学习社区（LCS）的发展 传播和实施社区参与和团队科学方面的最佳实践；和 目标4：实施创新的团队科学计划，以提高多学科的有效性 研究团队。