HDPTP--HAZMAT Disaster Preparedness Training Program

HDPTP--HAZMAT防灾培训计划

• 批准号: 8012008
• 负责人: Erich J Stafford
• 金额: $ 38.3万
• 依托单位: CENTER FOR CONSTRUCTION RES AND TRAINING
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2010
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2010-08-20 至 2015-07-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/8012008
• 关键词: Address; Area; Build-it; Collaborations; Containment; Data Collection; Disasters; Education and Outreach; Educational Curriculum; Emergency Situation; Ensure; Evaluation; Evaluation Reports; Excision; Funding; Generations; Goals; Hand; Hazardous Substances; Health; Institutes; International; Language; Left; Minor; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Performance; Phase; Population; Private Sector; Reader; Readiness; Recovery; Registries; Request for Applications; Research Training; Resources; Rights; Role; Safety; Trade Unions; Trainers Training; Training; Training Programs; Training and Education; Transportation; U-Series Cooperative Agreements; United States; Work; arm; base; emergency service responder; experience; health training; improved; instructor; man; metropolitan; model development; occupational health/safety; operation; outreach; programs; respiratory; response; skills; skills training; success; tool; wasting

The proposed program for the CPWR addresses the need to expand the current H/S training offered for hazardous material workers in construction. It builds on a proven record of competent training, which has provided a good curriculum of courses and course material on H/S training. A strong network of partners guarantees good access to the target audience. There were a number of minor weaknesses, primarily the lack of specifics. While the generalities in the proposal did cover all the areas that should be presented, the overall vagueness of the language left the reader dissatisfied with exactly what activities were being proposed.

拟议的CPWR计划解决了扩展为建筑中有害物质工人提供的当前H/S培训的必要性。 它建立在有能力的培训的可靠记录的基础上，该记录为H/S培训提供了良好的课程和课程材料。 强大的合作伙伴网络可确保与目标受众良好的良好访问权限。 有许多较小的弱点，主要是缺乏细节。 虽然提案中的一般性确实涵盖了应提出的所有领域，但该语言的整体模糊性使读者对所提出的活动完全不满意。