Privacy Value Networks

隐私价值网络

• 批准号: EP/G002606/1
• 负责人: Ian Brown
• 金额: $ 197.89万
• 依托单位: University of Oxford
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Research Grant
• 财政年份: 2008
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2008 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=EP%2FG002606%2F1
• 关键词: Privacy; Value; Networks

Identity and privacy have recently rarely been out of the headlines. Government has justified the need to identify citizens and track behaviour or security reasons, and promoted data sharing with the promise of the benefits of transformational government. Business argues that it needs to track customer behaviour both in the real world and theInternet to deliver personalised services that offer more targeted information and identify new business opportunities.The public is generally portrayed as unconcerned about privacy: based on opinion poll data, government argues that the majority of citizens support identification and surveillance, and commercial companies argue that customers are happy to volunteer detailed information about themselves in return for discounts or entry in a prize draw. In a recent report, the UK Information Commissioner characterised the situation as Sleepwalking into a Surveillance Society.Do citizens and customers really not care? Previous research has shown that in many situations, people opt for immediate benefits (or promises thereof), and are less concerned about future possible risks (or not aware of them). However, once people experience negative consequences, or discover risks they were unaware of, they tend to respond strongly - often abandoning services and technologies involved altogether. Examples of data sharing and leakage have raised awareness how data can be used and abused. Increasingly, people try to defend against the collection of sensitive or inappropriate data by refusing to register, or giving false information. Such responses can cause significant economic damage, or - in case of large numbers opting out or providing fake information / lead to a collection of data that has little or no value. The cost and benefit of collecting and storing data about individuals has not been properly examined, and the value of holding information about individuals for specific purposes is not understood. The project will help government and business to understand the value of personal data, as well as the value and risks for other stakeholders. The Home Office estimates that identity theft costs the UK 1.7bn each year, but without a proper cost-benefit analysis, it is impossible for data-collectors to understand how, or indeed whether, to reduce the amount of data that they collect.Research into privacy has both benefited and suffered from its multidisciplinary nature. The multitude of perspectives and methods has led to many detailed findings, but there is still a lack of clarity of what privacy is and what it means to different stakeholders in different contexts/scenarios of use. There has been no attempt to measure the cost and benefits to the stakeholders involved in comparable units. Most studies are one-off surveys, 'feeling the temperature' to general questions about privacy. There has been no study of how stakeholders' perception evolves over time, in response to experiences of benefits and drawback of data held about them. There is a lack of quality, empirical data on these issues, and how to collect it. The problem of collecting reliable data on people's perceptions surrounding sensitive data about them is akin to Schrdinger's Cat / to discuss privacy, you have to reveal things you want to keep private. The goal ofthe pvnets project is to develop new methodologies that enable us to break this paradox.

身份和隐私最近很少出现在头条新闻中。政府已证明有必要确定公民并跟踪行为或安全原因，并促进数据共享，并承诺变革政府的利益。企业认为，它需要跟踪现实世界中的客户行为和TheStretet，以提供个性化服务，以提供更多有针对性的信息并确定新的商机。公众通常被描绘成对隐私的不关心：基于意见民意调查，政府认为，政府认为，大多数公民支持身份证明和监视，商业公司认为，客户很乐意自愿提供有关自己的详细信息，以换取折扣或获得抽奖的折扣或入场。在最近的一份报告中，英国信息专员将这种情况描述为梦游社会。公民和客户真的不在乎吗？先前的研究表明，在许多情况下，人们选择立即获得好处（或承诺），并且不关心未来可能的风险（或不知道它们）。但是，一旦人们遇到负面后果或发现自己不知道的风险，他们倾向于做出强烈的反应 - 通常放弃服务和技术。数据共享和泄漏的示例提高了人们的意识如何使用和滥用数据。人们越来越多地试图通过拒绝注册或提供虚假信息来防止收集敏感或不当数据的收集。此类响应可能会造成重大的经济损害，或者 - 如果大量选择或提供虚假信息 /导致收集几乎没有价值的数据。收集和存储有关个人的数据的成本和好处尚未得到正确的检查，并且尚不了解有关个人出于特定目的的信息的价值。该项目将帮助政府和企业了解个人数据的价值，以及其他利益相关者的价值和风险。内政部估计，身份盗用每年为17亿英国盗用，但是如果没有适当的成本效益分析，数据收集者不可能了解如何或实际上是减少他们收集的数据量。隐私既受益于其多学科的性质。众多的观点和方法导致了许多详细的发现，但是在不同的情况/使用情况下，隐私是什么以及对不同利益相关者的意义仍然缺乏清晰度。没有试图衡量与可比单位相关的利益相关者的成本和收益。大多数研究是一次性调查，“感觉到温度”对隐私问题的一般性问题。尚未研究利益相关者的看法如何随着时间的流逝而演变，这是对福利的经历和有关其持有的数据的缺点的回应。在这些问题上缺乏质量，经验数据，以及如何收集它。收集有关人们对它们敏感数据的看法的可靠数据的问题类似于Schrdinger的猫 /要讨论隐私，您必须透露要保留私人的东西。 PVNETS项目的目标是开发新方法，使我们能够打破这种悖论。

项目成果

Privacy as a fuzzy concept: A new conceptualization of privacy for practitioners

隐私作为一个模糊概念：从业者对隐私的新概念化

• DOI: 10.1002/asi.23220
• 发表时间: 2014
• 期刊: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
• 影响因子: 3.5
• 作者: Vasalou A

Computers, Privacy and Data Protection: an Element of Choice

计算机、隐私和数据保护：选择要素

• DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-0641-5_12
• 发表时间: 2011
• 作者: Mazanderani F

A reflexive analysis of 'context' in privacy research: Two case studies in HIV care

隐私研究中“背景”的反思分析：艾滋病毒护理的两个案例研究

• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.06.001
• 发表时间: 2013
• 期刊: International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
• 影响因子: 5.4
• 作者: Mazanderani F

Privacy as Articulation Work in HIV Health Services

隐私作为艾滋病毒卫生服务中的衔接工作

• DOI: 10.1145/2675133.2675204
• 发表时间: 2015
• 作者: Papoutsi C

Weight Loss Blogging

减肥博客

• 发表时间: 2011
• 期刊: Interfaces
• 作者: Oostveen, A.