Theoretical Foundation Building for Philosophy of Law as Public Philosophy

作为公共哲学的法哲学的理论基础构建

基本信息

批准号：
15330002
负责人：
INOUE Tatsuo
金额：
$ 7.3万
依托单位：
The University of Tokyo
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
2003
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2003 至 2005
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

Our research aimed to reconstruct philosophy of law as public philosophy by investigating comprehensively into the philosophical basis and normative implications of the concept of publicness. It was focused on the three tasks : (1)assessing the comparative merits and demerits of the competing conceptions of publicness, and constructing a unifying theory that can adequately accommodate their tensions and turn them into fruitful complementarities ; (2)presenting new approaches to the traditional issues about the concept of law by exploring into the internal connection between the concept of law and that of publicness ; and (3)elucidating the mediating role of positive law and its institutional structure in turning the ideal theory of publicness into reality under non-ideal conditions. Our results are as followsTask (1) : We have found the following conclusions warranted. First, the competing traditional conceptions of publicness can be adequately characterized and contrasted by classifyi … More ng them into the three models : sphere-based theory, agent-based theory and process-based theory. Second, the traditional three models are inadequate to get over the legitimacy-crisis in contemporary pluralistic societies. Third, the new fourth model, reason-based theory that we constructed as an alternative to the traditional models can work as a unifying theory that overcomes their limits and defects and rescues their complementary merits by articulating the underlying principle that they need as their normative ground and constraint.Task (2) : We have shown that the conceptual distinction between the first-order and second-order publicness and the related one between publicness in law and publicness of law implied by reason-based theory give us the best theoretical vantage point from which we can elucidate the internal connections between law and publicness and identify the crucial normative issues neglected in the conceptual analyses and debates about the nature of law. To exemplify this point, we discussed the issues of duty to obey law, revolutionary creation of law, limits of law and othersTask (3) : We have reached the conclusion that positive law can effectively sustain and develop the public order of contemporary societies only if two conditions are met. First, to enhance the publicness in law, both legal interpretation and legislation must be informed and guided by a more principled deliberation on substantive and specific public values (the first-order publicness) than it is now the case. Second, to secure publicness of law, the institutional structure for legal decision making must be designed not just with the view of improving its quality in terms of the first-order publicness but also with full consideration for the second-order publicness. We have realized that legisprudence (the theory of legislation), now emerging in contemporary legal philosophy, can play an indispensable role in finding effective ways to meet these conditions and that we have to organize a new joint research in legisprudence to develop the present onePart of the results of our research was presented in international settings. Inoue published two papers in internationally coauthored books as shown in the References below. Inoue and Takikawa presented their papers at the World Congress of the international association of Legal and Social Philosophy (IVR) held at Granada in 2005. Takikawa's paper was published in the proceedings of this conference, and Inoue's paper is to appear in a new book edited by Luc Wintgens now in preparation for publication. Domestically, a book that is comprised of the contributions by all the investigators and collaborators for our project is forthcoming from Nakanishiya Shuppan Less

我们的研究旨在通过全面调查公共概念的哲学基础和正常含义来重建法律哲学作为公共哲学。它的重点是这三个任务：（1）评估竞争性公众概念的比较优点和缺点，并构建一个统一的理论，可以充分适应他们的紧张局势并将其变成富有成果的互补性；（2）通过探索法律概念与公共性的内部联系，介绍有关法律概念的新方法；（3）阐明积极法律的中介作用及其制度结构在将理想的公共性理论转化为在非理想条件下的现实。我们的结果如下（1）：我们发现了以下结论。首先，可以通过分类充分表征和对比的传统公共性概念……更多地将它们融入了三种模型：基于球体的理论，基于代理的理论和基于过程的理论。其次，传统的三个模型不足以克服当代多元化社会中的合法性危机。第三，我们构建的新的第四个模型，基于理性的基于传统模型的替代方法可以作为一种统一的理论来克服其限制和缺陷，并通过阐明他们需要作为正常的基础和约束的基本原则来克服其完善的优点。理论为我们提供了最好的理论有利位置，我们可以从中阐明法律与公众之间的内部联系，并确定有关法律本质的概念分析和辩论中忽略的关键正常问题。为了豁免这一点，我们讨论了遵守法律的义务问题，革命性的法律创建，法律限制和Otherstask（3）：我们得出的结论是，只有在满足两个条件的情况下，积极法律才能有效地维持和发展当代社会的公共秩序。首先，为了提高法律公众的公众意义，必须以对实质性和特定的公共价值（一阶公众）进行更委托的审议和法律解释和立法的指导。其次，为了确保法律的公开，法律决策的机构结构不仅必须在一阶公共场所提高其质量，而且要全面考虑二阶公众。我们已经意识到，现在在当代法律哲学中出现的Legissprudence（立法理论）可以在寻找有效的方法来满足这些条件方面发挥不可或缺的作用，并且我们必须在国际环境中组织一项新的Legissprudence的新共同研究，以开发我们研究结果的当前一方面。 Inoue在国际合着的书籍中发表了两篇论文，如下所示。 Inoue和Takikawa于2005年在格拉纳达举行的国际法律与社会哲学协会（IVR）的世界大会上发表了论文。高川的论文发表在本次会议的会议记录中，Inoue的论文将出现在Luc Wintgens编辑的一本新书中，以准备出版。国内，由所有调查员和合作者为我们项目的贡献组成的书都来自Nakanishya Shuppan