Comparative Study on Social and Spatial Succession with Housing and Urban Reconstruction Process After Earthquake Disasters in Asia

亚洲地震灾后社会空间演替与住房和城市重建过程的比较研究

基本信息

批准号：
16252002
负责人：
NAKABAYASHI Itsuki
金额：
$ 27.79万
依托单位：
Tokyo Metropolitan University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A)
财政年份：
2004
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2004 至 2006
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

Recently, a lot of earthquake disasters have happened in Asia. From those earthquakes, comparative surveys about social-spatial succession and mandates were conducted on Turkey Marmara (1999), Taiwan Chi-chi (1999) and Hanshin-Awaji (1995). Spatial aspect of recovery from earthquake disasters has two patterns, the former is transferring recovery. The latter is on devastated site recovery. Though these two patterns were observed each nation, there were contractive activities in both patterns.In Japan, self-help is a principal of recovery. For households owned their houses, on devastated site recovery is a main path, but group removal project for disaster prevention has been done because of risk on devastated site. The other hand, most of households rented houses took transferring recovery pattern. They also rented houses apart from on site.In Turkey, soil conditions were main reason of building loss. Then, building prohibit regulation were executed and apartment or office buildings which built on no damaged suburb area were sold by special prices to damaged house or office owners on condition of only one house or office. On results, rebuilding and repairing damaged buildings was definitely delayed.In Taiwan, cevastated area were around area of moved faults and mountain rural area above epicenter. The principal of recovery is on devastated site recovery. But if there was a severe conditioned settlement where had risk of land slide or existed on strict slope, transferring recovery project had been conducted. The main characteristics of recovery form Chi-chi earthquake Was the role of public-private recovery fund organization that flexibly supported group activities like damaged condominium rebuilding project.]The photos and GIS database which archived recovery actualities was produced experimentally.

近期，亚洲发生多起地震灾害。根据这些地震，对土耳其马尔马拉（1999）、台湾Chi-chi（1999）和阪神淡路（1995）进行了关于社会空间演替和任务的比较调查。地震灾害恢复的空间方面有两种模式，前者是转移恢复。后者正在进行受损场地恢复。尽管每个国家都观察到这两种模式，但两种模式都存在收缩活动。在日本，自助是恢复的原则。对于有房户来说，灾区恢复是主要途径，但由于灾区存在风险，所以进行了防灾集体搬迁工程。另一方面，大部分出租房屋家庭采取了转移回收的模式。他们还在现场以外租用房屋。在土耳其，土壤条件是建筑物损失的主要原因。随后，实施禁建规定，将在未受损郊区建造的公寓或办公楼以特价出售给受损房屋或办公室业主，条件是只有一套房屋或办公室。结果，受损建筑物的重建和修复肯定被推迟了。在台湾，被毁坏的地区主要是活动断层周围和震中以上的山区农村地区。恢复的主要内容是受损站点的恢复。但如果存在条件恶劣、存在滑坡风险或存在严格坡度的沉降，则进行了转移恢复工程。集集地震恢复的主要特点是公私恢复基金组织的作用，灵活支持受损公寓重建项目等集体活动。]实验性地制作了记录恢复现状的照片和GIS数据库。