Implementing Evidence-based Informed Consent Practices to Address the Risk of Alzheimer's Dementia and Cognitive Impairment in Clinical Trials

实施循证知情同意实践，以解决临床试验中阿尔茨海默氏症痴呆和认知障碍的风险

• 批准号: 10394876
• 负责人: James M Dubois
• 金额: $ 53.09万
• 依托单位: WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2018
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2018-08-15 至 2024-04-30
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/10394876
• 关键词: Address; Adopted; Adoption; Alzheimer' s Disease; Alzheimer' s disease risk; Assessment tool; Attitude; Budgets; Clinical Research; Clinical Trials; Conduct Clinical Trials; Consent; Consent Forms; Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research; Control Groups; Data; Development; E-learning; Elements; Enrollment; Ethics; Facebook; Family member; Fostering; Grant; Guidelines; Happiness; Impaired cognition; Individual; Informed Consent; Institutional Review Boards; Intervention; Interview; Language; LinkedIn; Measures; Methods; Online Systems; Outcome; Participant; Patients; Persons; Policies; Policy Maker; Positioning Attribute; Principal Investigator; Process; Publications; Randomized; Research; Research Ethics; Research Support; Resources; Surveys; Testing; Twitter; United States; United States National Institutes of Health; Work; Workload; behavior change; clinical practice; design; effectiveness testing; evidence base; experience; formative assessment; impaired capacity; implementation science; implementation trial; innovation; interest; member; outcome prediction; primary outcome; research in practice; satisfaction; social media; social stigma; surrogate decision maker; trait

Project Summary Informed consent is a cornerstone of the ethical conduct of research. This poses a challenge for research involving participants with Alzheimer's disease or cognitive impairments. On the one hand, cognitive impairment can interfere with the capacity to understand, appreciate, and reason with information, potentially compromising the quality of consent. On the other hand, research holds the key to treatment advances for those with Alzheimer's dementia and cognitive impairment. Excluding individuals from research can impede progress. Its is also often unnecessary, because following best practices for informed consent can often enable individuals or their surrogates to provide consent while adequately protecting participants. Level 1 evidence indicates benefits of each of the following best practices in research involving patients with Alzheimer's disease: (a) Use plain language and figures in consent forms or consent aids; (b) assess participants' understanding of consent information using a validated measure; (c) discuss consent information that individuals misunderstood during assessment; and (d) assess ability to appoint a surrogate decision- maker or study partner. Our preliminary research indicates that these best practices are not routinely followed, and some studies find persistent problems with the consent process in clinical trials. Accordingly, the proposed project aims to implement consent best practices among clinical research coordinators (CRCs) and principal investigators (PIs) in the United States. This project will use surveys and interviews of CRCs, PIs, Alzheimer's Disease family members, and IRB members or staff to identify current practices and barriers to implementing consent best practices. Informed by survey and interview data, we will test the effectiveness of a web-based toolkit with resources that explain and facilitate the use of consent best practices. We will push the toolkit to CRCs/PIs in the implementation group (n=600) using social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn and will examine whether implementation group outcomes (e.g., attitudes, intent to adopt, and adoption of best practices) are superior to those of the control group (n=300). By increasing use of consent best practices, this innovative study will have a significant impact on the ethical conduct of clinical trials with participants with Alzheimer's disease or cognitive impairments, and will reduce barriers to enrolling participants with Alzheimer's disease. It will also advance our understanding of how to implement best practices in research ethics, which is important because current approaches are ineffective.

项目摘要 知情同意是研究道德行为的基石。这对研究构成了挑战 参与者患有阿尔茨海默氏病或​​认知障碍。一方面，认知 损害可能会干扰了解，欣赏和理性的能力，从而有可能 损害同意的质量。另一方面，研究是治疗进展的关键 那些患有阿尔茨海默氏症的痴呆症和认知障碍的人。从研究中排除个人可能会阻碍 进步。它通常也是不必要的，因为遵循知情同意的最佳实践通常可以实现 个人或其代理人在充分保护参与者的同时提供同意。 第1级证据表明，在涉及患者的研究中，以下每种最佳实践的好处 阿尔茨海默氏病：（a）以同意形式或同意艾滋病使用普通语言和数字； （b）评估 参与者使用经过验证的措施对同意信息的理解； （c）讨论同意信息 个人在评估中误解了； （d）评估任命替代决策的能力 - 制造商或学习伙伴。 我们的初步研究表明，这些最佳实践并未经常遵循，并且一些研究 在临床试验中，通过同意过程找到持久问题。因此，拟议的项目旨在 在临床研究协调员（CRC）和首席研究人员中实施最佳实践 （PIS）在美国。 该项目将使用CRC，PIS，Alzheimer Dise Disision家人和IRB的调查和访谈 会员或员工确定实施同意最佳做法的当前做法和障碍。通知 通过调查和访谈数据，我们将通过资源来测试基于网络的工具包的有效性 并促进同意使用最佳实践。我们将在实施中将工具包推向CRC/PIS 组（n = 600）使用Twitter，Facebook和LinkedIn等社交媒体平台，并将检查 实施小组成果（例如，态度，采用意图和采用最佳实践的意图）是否是 优于对照组的（n = 300）。 通过增加同意最佳实践的使用，这项创新的研究将对 患有阿尔茨海默氏病或​​认知障碍的参与者的临床试验的道德行为，并将 减少让参与者患有阿尔茨海默氏病的障碍。这也将提高我们对 如何在研究道德中实施最佳实践，这很重要，因为当前的方法是 无效。

项目成果

Perceived barriers to assessing understanding and appreciation of informed consent in clinical trials: A mixed-method study.

• DOI: 10.1017/cts.2021.807
• 发表时间: 2021
• 期刊: Journal of clinical and translational science
• 影响因子: 2.6
• 作者: Solomon ED;Mozersky J;Baldwin K;Wroblewski MP;Parsons MV;Goodman M;DuBois JM
• 通讯作者: DuBois JM

Houston We Have a Problem: Ground Zero for the US Coronavirus Outbreak.

休斯顿，我们有一个问题：美国冠状病毒爆发的归零地。

• DOI: 10.1353/nib.2021.0014
• 发表时间: 2021
• 期刊: Narrative inquiry in bioethics
• 作者: Tu,Yuan-Po

Therapeutic Misconception, Misestimation and COVID-19 Research.

• DOI: 10.1353/nib.2021.0022
• 发表时间: 2021-01-01
• 期刊: Narrative inquiry in bioethics
• 作者: Dehority, Walter

How are US institutions implementing the new key information requirement?

• DOI: 10.1017/cts.2020.1
• 发表时间: 2020-01-10
• 期刊: Journal of clinical and translational science
• 影响因子: 2.6
• 作者: Mozersky J;Wroblewski MP;Solomon ED;DuBois JM
• 通讯作者: DuBois JM

Personal Narrative About COVID-19 Research.

关于 COVID-19 研究的个人叙述。

• DOI: 10.1353/nib.2021.0002
• 发表时间: 2021
• 期刊: Narrative inquiry in bioethics
• 作者: Schiller,Gary