Qing Dynasty imperial succession during the Kangxi Era from the perspective of movements among banner princes

从旗王运动看清康熙年间的皇位继承

基本信息

批准号：
22720274
负责人：
SUZUKI Makoto
金额：
$ 2.25万
依托单位：
Notre Dame Seishin University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B)
财政年份：
2010
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2010 至 2012
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

In this study, I take up issue of imperial succession during the Qing Kangxi period (1662-1722), clarify the background of the problems of why the official naming of the crown prince was executed as in the earlier Chinese dynasties, characterized by the naming of the crown price by the emperor while still alive, rather than by the customary means based on Qing tradition (selection of successors through the consensus of powerful leaders) and why a specific imperial prince gained popularity within the court after the disinheritance of the crown prince and attempt to elucidate the power structure within the court during this period.The traditional consensus system of the Manchurians was rejected in the naming of the crown prince during the Kangxi period and this is conventionally seen as proof of a display of respect by Kangxi Emperor for the Chinese Emperors. In actuality, however, there was no change whatsoever from the installation regime during the early years of the Qing Dynasty as described above. That is, the crown prince of the Kangxi court was not only backed up by imperial authority but was installed in that position through the support of the powerful banner princes and clans and, as during the early years of the Qing Dynasty, their speculations and interests exerted a strong effect on the successor to the emperor. In that sense, it could probably be said that the power structure of the early Qing Dynasty essentially continued on until the end of the Kangxi period.

In this study, I take up issue of imperial succession during the Qing Kangxi period (1662-1722), clarify the background of the problems of why the official naming of the crown prince was executed as in the earlier Chinese dynasties, characterized by the naming of the crown price by the emperor while still alive, rather than by the customary means based on Qing tradition (selection of successors through the consensus of powerful leaders) and why a specific imperial prince gained在此期间，在王储王子的取消并试图阐明法院内部的权力结构后，法院内部的受欢迎程度。在Kangxi时期命名王储的传统共识制度被拒绝，并且通常将其视为康克斯（Kangxi）对中国emperor的尊重的证明。但是，实际上，在清朝的早期，如上所述，安装方案没有任何变化。也就是说，Kangxi法院的王储不仅得到了帝国权威的支持，而且通过强大的旗帜王子和氏族的支持来安装在该职位，就像在清朝的初期一样，他们的猜测和利益对皇帝的继任者产生了强大的影响。从这个意义上讲，可以说清朝早期的力量结构基本上一直持续到康奇时期结束。