REALIZATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF INDIGENOUS RIGHTS IN MODERN STATE --- A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE AINU AND THE NATIVE HAWAIIANS

现代国家土著权利的实现与落实——阿努族与夏威夷原住民的比较研究

基本信息

批准号：
12620018
负责人：
TSUNEMOTO Teruki
金额：
$ 1.73万
依托单位：
HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2000
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2000 至 2001
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-12620018/
关键词：
indigenous people constitution equality Hawaii ハワイ先住民アイヌ民族先住権

项目摘要

The purpose of this research project is to seek models for realization and implementation of rights of indigenous people in Japan. The study focused on the Native Hawaiians because they bear notable resemblance to the Ainu people in terms that the Native Hawaiians have never formally been recognized as "Indian tribe" by the federal government and the federal laws focusing to the tribes have not applied to the Native Hawaiians. Based on these understandings, I investigated the constitutional and legal status of the Native Hawaiians. I especially paid attention to Rice v. Cayetano decision, handed down by the United States Supreme Court in February 2000, which declared that the state law limiting the Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) trustee election to Native Hawaiians contravened the Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution guaranteeing equality of voting rights. I also studied the programs operated by the OHA for welfare and betterment of native Hawaiians. Another theme of investigation was constitutional and legal history of Native Hawaiians since the present legal system for them rooted deeply in the history.As a result of the research, it became fairly clear that it is constitutionally possible to guarantee and to implement the rights of native people without the formal recognition as a indigenous people by the national government.

该研究项目的目的是寻求模型，以实现和实施日本土著人民权利。这项研究重点是夏威夷原住民，因为他们与艾因努人民显着相似，因为夏威夷人从来没有被联邦政府正式将其正式称为“印度部落”，而对部落的联邦法律则不适用于本地人。夏威夷人。根据这些理解，我调查了夏威夷原住民的宪法和法律地位。我特别关注了美国最高法院于2000年2月发出的赖斯诉卡耶塔诺裁决，该裁决宣布，州法律限制了夏威夷事务办公室（OHA）的受托人选举向夏威夷原住民违反了《统一》第15条修正案国家宪法保证投票权平等。我还研究了OHA为福利和改善夏威夷人而运营的计划。调查的另一个主题是夏威夷原住民的宪法和法律历史，因为目前的法律制度根深蒂固于历史上。由于研究的结果，很明显，在宪法上可以保证并实施本地人的权利是宪法上可能的没有正式承认作为土著人民的人。