International Comparative Research on the Deregulation of Private Employment Agency and the Revision of ILO Convention no.96

私营职业介绍所放松管制与国际劳工组织第96号公约修订的国际比较研究

• 批准号: 09630039
• 负责人: GOKA Kazumichi
• 金额: $ 1.02万
• 依托单位: Kanazawa University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 1997
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1997 至 1998
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-09630039/
• 关键词: Employment Exchange System; Private Employment Agency; Worker Dispatching Business; Deregulation of Labor Market; Fee-charging Employment Agency; 労働市場の規制緩和; ILO

A.In Japan flexibility of employment and deregulation of labor policies means to loosen regulations for protection of workers in the areas of labor standard, labor market, personnel management and industrial relations. We made it clear that, first, deregulation of worker dispatching business does not bring about the improvement of structural unemployment, but the increase of unemployment and precarious employment. Secondly, liberalization of private employment agency does not lead to the increase ofjobs. Thirdly fee-charging employment agents tend to prefer high paid employees to low paid ones as their target.B.We investigated the following points in the United Kingdom and Germany ; 1) how private employment agency and worker dispatching business have been liberalized in 1990s, 2) whether this liberalization has brought about the improvement of long term unemployment or not in the labor market, 3) what kinds of employment have increased by flexibility of employment policies. Moreover, we studied what kind of impact the increase of temporary employment in U.S.A had on the industrial relations.C.The new JILO Convention on private employment agency (no. 181) was adopted at International Labor Conference in 1997. Advocates of deregulation of labor policies consider that the new Convention intends the private employment agencies, but also to promote the protection ofjob seekers and dispatched workers through some records of the International Labor Conference in 1997.

A.在日本的就业灵活性和对劳动力政策的放松管制意味着放弃在劳动力标准，劳动力市场，人事管理和劳资关系领域保护工人的法规。我们明确表明，首先，对工人派遣业务的放松管制并没有带来结构性失业的改善，而是导致失业率的增加和不稳定的就业。其次，私人就业机构的自由化不会导致工作的增加。第三，收费的就业代理人倾向于将高薪雇员而不是低薪雇员作为目标。B。我们研究了英国和德国的以下几点； 1）私人就业机构和工人派遣业务在1990年代如何自由化，2）这种自由化是否导致长期失业率在劳动力市场中的改善，3）3）通过灵活的就业政策的灵活性增加了哪些就业。此外，我们研究了美国的临时雇佣增加对劳资关系的影响。

项目成果

澤田 幹: "アメリカにおける雇用の変容と労使関係" 金沢大学経済学部論集. 19・2. 1-28 (1999)

泽田美纪：《美国的就业转型与劳资关系》金泽大学经济学院文集19・2（1999）。

Kazumichi Goka: "Deregulation Policies on the Labour Market and Private Employment Agencies in Present-day Japan" 龍谷大学社会科学研究所年報. 28. (1998)

Kazumichi Goka：“当今日本劳动力市场和私营就业机构的放松管制政策”龙谷大学社会科学研究所年度报告28。（1998）。