A research for constraints on area of activation that determined memory development.

一项关于决定记忆发展的激活区域限制的研究。

基本信息

批准号：
07801021
负责人：
TOYOTA Hiroshi
金额：
$ 0.7万
依托单位：
Nara University of Education
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1995
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1995 至 1997
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-07801021/
关键词：
memory development area of activation semantic constraint syntactic constraint Constraints on Area of Spreading Activation hypothesis 偶発記憶自由再生反意連想記憶発達活性化

项目摘要

The purpose of the present study was to examine the validity of Constrains on Area of Spreaing Activation (CASA) hypothesis. The hypothesis assumed that the level of activation of a to-be-remembered word (TBR) determined whether TBR was recalled or not and that the level of activation of TBR was maintained by constraints of contexts on spreading activation.Exp.1 and 2 indicated that TBR in the context of strong semantic constraint to TBR was more recalled than TBR in the context of weak one. Exp.3 showed that TBR presented with subordinate associate was more recalled than it did with superordinate one. Exp.4 and 5 indicated that TBR (noun or adjective) paired with a adjective (or noun) associate was more recalled than it with a noun (or adjective) one. Exp.6 showed that TBR was less recalled when it elicited both forward and backward associates than when it elicited only either (forward or backward) one. Exp.7 showed that TBR elicited the subordinate associate was more recalled than it did the superordinate one. Exp.8,9 and 10 indicated that TBR (noun or adjective) elicited a adjective (or noun) associate was more recalled than it did a noun (or adjective) one. Exp.11-14 indicated that developmental changes in constraints of contexts on spreading activation. These results supported the CASA hypothesis.

本研究的目的是检查限制对普力激活（CASA）假设的约束的有效性。该假设假设一个要记忆的单词的激活水平（TBR）确定了是否召回了TBR，并且TBR的激活水平是通过上下文对传播激活的上下文的约束来维持的。EXP.Exp.Exp.Exp.1和2表明，TBR在TBR上比TBR的强度召回的tbr在TBR上比较弱的一个弱点更召回了TBR的上下文。 EXP.3表明，与上级相比，呈现下属助理的TBR更被召回。 Exp.4和5表示，TBR（名词或形容词）与形容词（或名词）辅助的配对比使用名词（或形容词）一个更召回。 Exp.6表明，当TBR引起前向和向后的同伴时，它比仅引起（前向或向后）一个时的召唤率更少。 Exp.7表明，与上级相比，TBR引起的下属助理的召回更多。 Exp.8,9和10表明TBR（名词或形容词）引起的形容词（或名词）关联比其名词（或形容词）更召回。 Exp.11-14表明，上下文传播激活的限制的发展变化。这些结果支持CASA假设。