Decision for Dental Disease Treatment and Social Backgrounds

牙科疾病治疗的决定和社会背景

基本信息

批准号：
05045048
负责人：
MAEDA Yoshinobu
金额：
$ 2.88万
依托单位：
Osaka University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for international Scientific Research
财政年份：
1993
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1993 至 1995
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-05045048/
关键词：
decsion dental disease treatment needs interview social backgrounds patients dentists 必要性 Decision Dental Disease Treatment Social Backgrounds

项目摘要

The objective of this project is to analyze the influence of educational, social, and cultural background of dentists on examining patients, diagnosing, and deciding treatment needs, and establishing treatment plan. We compared Japanese dentists with Canadian dentists using same patient models with by the role playing interview method.In this report we made the assumption that Canadian patients visited the Japanese and Canadian general practitioner where dentists had to do the diagnosis and treatment plan based on the prepared information related to those patients, including intora-and extra oralinformation. From transcriptions of recorded conversation between subjects an examiner, we made two types of flow charts. With these flow charts, result were analyzed and compared among subjects.Significant difference was not found in established treatment plan among subjects in terms of final goal of treatment for each patient. With this, we can speculate that decisions standardfor need and go … More al of treatment in both group were almost the same. This implies that dentists in both countries share the common professional knowledge, technigues and materials. Individual difference among subjects regarding these items which could reflects ones clinical experience was significant. Difference among Japanese and Canadian dentist as the group was not found except for the referral to specialists. This difference comes from the fact that referral system has not been common so far in Japan.Some tries to establish the diagnosis in the early stage than to find out additional evidences to support his decision somewhat like so-called inductive method. Other went through all the date before reaching the finial diagnosis where we can describe as deductive method. Regarding presentation of treatment plans to patients showed the difference among Japanese and Canadian dentist as the group. We can speculate that these differences arose from the health insurance system difference between two countries. Less

该项目的目的是分析牙科医生的教育，社会和文化背景对检查患者，诊断和确定治疗需求的影响，并建立治疗计划。我们将日本牙医与加拿大牙医使用相同的患者模型进行了比较。在本报告中，我们假设加拿大患者访问了日本和加拿大一般从业人员，在那里牙医必须根据与包括Intora-intora-intora and ExtraLineformation的患者相关的准备信息来制定诊断和治疗计划。从受试者之间记录的对话的抄录，我们制作了两种流程图。使用这些流程图，对结果进行了分析并比较受试者。在受试者之间建立的治疗计划中没有发现每个患者的治疗目标。因此，我们可以推测需要的决策标准并进行……两组的更多治疗几乎相同。这意味着这两个国家的牙医都具有共同的专业知识，技术和材料。有关这些项目的受试者之间的个体差异，这些项目可能反映临床经验，这是显着的。日本和加拿大牙医之间的差异除了转介专家外，没有发现该小组。这种差异源于以下事实：在日本到目前为止，转介系统并不常见。一些试图在早期阶段建立诊断，而不是找出其他证据来支持他的决定，就像所谓的归纳方法。其他人在达到最终诊断之前就经历了所有日期，我们可以将其描述为演绎方法。关于对患者的治疗计划的介绍，表明日本和加拿大牙医之间的差异是该组。我们可以推测，这些差异来自两个国家之间的健康保险系统差异。较少的