The Cognitive Pragmatic Investigation of Conceptualization in the Process of Text Understanding and Its Phenomenological Considerations

文本理解过程中概念化的认知语用研究及其现象学思考

• 批准号: 15500169
• 负责人: HIROSE Keiko
• 金额: $ 1.79万
• 依托单位: Aichi Prefectural University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 2003
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2003 至 2005
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-15500169/
• 关键词: Cognitive Linguistics; reading comprehension; text; concepualization; metaphor; image schemas; mapping; radial categories; ディスコース; テクスト理解過程; テクスト産出過程; 第二言語; 関係性と比較; 実体と属性; コミュニケーション

Our investigations have shown that the basic concepts in cognitive linguistics such as "construal" and "radial categories," are consistently valid in analyzing linguistic units at all levels- not only at word level but also at discourse level. Especially, it has been made clear that those concepts, together with their related concepts such as "frames" and "foregounding/profiling" are very effective in analyzing the processes in interpersonal conversations in which the meaning of a certain word may shift slightly and gradually as the discourse evolves among the participants, leading to serious misunderstanding among them. Our investigations have also made clear that the above-mentioned concepts in cognitive linguistics can explain in an integrated way the process of the emergence of meaning in text through constructionist processes by means of "counter discourses." These results of our investigations confirm the methodological effectiveness of these cognitive linguistic concepts in futu … More re cognitive pragmatics research.We assumed from the outset that especially in the case of highly abstract texts of philosophy the success of text understanding greatly depends upon the reader's ability to understand analogical and metaphorical expressions that appear in such texts. Upon this assumption the cognitive linguistic theory of analogy and metaphor has been investigated, and their functions in the understanding of philosophical texts have been elucidated. Our investigations have shown that almost all fundamental concepts of philosophy are originated in metaphors or analogies in some way. Although fundamental concepts of philosophy can be characterized as highly abstract, they are rooted in our concrete experiences, and they reflect some image-schemas that have emerged through our concrete body-experiences and sensory-motor patterns. For instance, the expressions of temporal relation, which are used in philosophical discussions, are highly abstract in their character. Such relations may be often expressed by means of spatial schemas in discussions of philosophers. In this case, spatial phenomena function as the "source-domain," and the "target-domain" is temporal relation. Our investigations have made clear that many philosophical concepts might have emerged from the metaphorical "mapping" in the history of thoughts. Less

我们的研究表明，认知语言学中的基本概念，如“解释”和“径向范畴”，在分析各个层面的语言单位时始终有效——不仅在单词层面，而且特别是在话语层面。显然，这些概念及其相关概念（例如“框架”和“前景/侧写”）在分析人际对话过程中非常有效，其中随着对话在对话中的发展，某个单词的含义可能会轻微而逐渐地发生变化。 ，导致严重的我们的研究还表明，认知语言学中的上述概念可以通过“反话语”的方式综合解释文本中意义的出现过程。确认这些认知语言概念在未来认知语用学研究中的方法论有效性。我们从一开始就假设，特别是在高度抽象的哲学文本的情况下，文本理解的成功在很大程度上取决于读者理解类比和隐喻的能力基于这种假设，我们对类比和隐喻的认知语言理论进行了研究，并阐明了它们在理解哲学文本中的功能，我们的研究表明，几乎所有哲学的基本概念都起源于隐喻。尽管哲学的基本概念可以被认为是高度抽象的，但它们植根于我们的具体经验，并且反映了通过我们具体的身体经验和感觉运动模式而出现的一些图像图式。 , 时间性的表达哲学讨论中使用的关系在性质上是高度抽象的，在哲学家的讨论中，这种关系通常可以通过空间图式来表达。在这种情况下，空间现象充当“源域”和“源域”。 “目标域”是时间关系。我们的研究表明，许多哲学概念可能是从思想史上的隐喻“映射”中产生的。少

项目成果

デイビッド・リー『実例で学ぶ認知言語学』(訳者解説10ページ)

David Lee《通过实例学习认知语言学》（译者评论第10页）

• 发表时间: 2006
• 作者: 廣瀬 恵子;Keiko Hirose;Kunie Miyaura;廣瀬 恵子;Isamu Miyahara;宮原 勇;廣瀬恵子;宮原 勇;Keiko Hirose;Isamu Miyahara;Isamu Miyahara;宮原 勇;宮浦 国江(翻訳と解説)
• 通讯作者: 宮浦 国江(翻訳と解説)

図説・現代哲学で考える<表現・テキスト・解釈>

通过插画和现代哲学思考<表达/文字/诠释>

• 发表时间: 2004
• 作者: 廣瀬 恵子;Keiko Hirose;Kunie Miyaura;廣瀬 恵子;Isamu Miyahara;宮原 勇;廣瀬恵子;宮原 勇;Keiko Hirose;Isamu Miyahara;Isamu Miyahara;宮原 勇;宮浦 国江(翻訳と解説);宮原 勇(分担執筆);廣瀬 恵子(単著);宮原 勇(単著);Keiko Hirose;Isamu Miyahara;廣瀬 恵子;宮原 勇;宮原 勇(単著)
• 通讯作者: 宮原 勇(単著)

哲学は何を問うべきか(第II部第3章「理解と歴史」)

哲学应该问什么问题？（第二部分第三章“理解与历史”）

• 发表时间: 2005
• 作者: 廣瀬 恵子;Keiko Hirose;Kunie Miyaura;廣瀬 恵子;Isamu Miyahara;宮原 勇;廣瀬恵子;宮原 勇;Keiko Hirose;Isamu Miyahara;Isamu Miyahara;宮原 勇;宮浦 国江(翻訳と解説);宮原 勇(分担執筆)
• 通讯作者: 宮原 勇(分担執筆)

Product and Preocess in the L1 and L2 Writing of Japanese Students of English

日本英语学生母语和母语写作的产物和过程

• 发表时间: 2005
• 作者: 廣瀬 恵子;Keiko Hirose;Kunie Miyaura;廣瀬 恵子;Isamu Miyahara;宮原 勇;廣瀬恵子;宮原 勇;Keiko Hirose;Isamu Miyahara;Isamu Miyahara;宮原 勇;宮浦 国江(翻訳と解説);宮原 勇(分担執筆);廣瀬 恵子(単著);宮原 勇(単著);Keiko Hirose
• 通讯作者: Keiko Hirose

Philosophical Thinking about <Mind, Computer, and Brain>

关于<心灵、计算机和大脑>的哲学思考

• 发表时间: 2005
• 作者: 廣瀬 恵子;Keiko Hirose;Kunie Miyaura;廣瀬 恵子;Isamu Miyahara;宮原 勇;廣瀬恵子;宮原 勇;Keiko Hirose;Isamu Miyahara;Isamu Miyahara;宮原 勇;宮浦 国江(翻訳と解説);宮原 勇(分担執筆);廣瀬 恵子(単著);宮原 勇(単著);Keiko Hirose;Isamu Miyahara
• 通讯作者: Isamu Miyahara