A Study on the Formative Process of Administrative Area and Facility Service Areas-A Study on the Zoning Techniques for the Facility Service Areas-

行政区域与设施服务区形成过程研究-设施服务区分区技术研究-

• 批准号: 05650587
• 负责人: TOMOKIYO Takakazu
• 金额: $ 1.41万
• 依托单位: KAGOShIMA UNIVERSITY
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 1993
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1993 至 1995
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-05650587/
• 关键词: Facility Planing; Zoning; Administrative Area; Living Area; Service Area; Historical Process

This study makes clear the relationship between the administrative area and the facilities area. We studied areas familiar to us in this geographic region and we investigated the formative process in the creation of administrative distinctions based upon historical fact. The areas chosen specifically for the study are Kagosima, Miyazaki and Oita.As a result, in Kagosima the borderline in 1889 was decided on "Gou" (in the Satuma clan) in the Edo period and it has existed still now. Some parts of the Satuma clan had belonged to Miyazaki. But these parts might not necessarily be accord with the borderline in 1889. In Oita the borderline in 1889 was determined an administrative area in 1884. Now, the administrative area in 1995 is based upon the borderline in 1889.We classified the kinds of the facility service areas 8 types based upon the from of the administrative area. As a result, we made it clear that the facility service areas in three prefectures were greatly influenced by the administrative area and the formation processes ; what is more were influenced by an old administrative area. And a similar characteristic was exhibited in Kagosima and Miyazaki. However, the relationship between these functions was different in Oita.

这项研究明确了行政区域与设施区域之间的关系。我们研究了这个地理区域中对我们熟悉的领域，并研究了基于历史事实创建行政区分的形成过程。专门为这项研究选择的领域是Kagosima，Miyazaki和Oita。结果，在Kagosima中，1889年的边界是在江户时代决定“ GOU”（在Satuma氏族中），现在仍然存在。 Satuma家族的某些部分属于宫崎骏。但是这些部分可能不一定符合1889年的边界。在OITA，1889年的边缘线在1884年被确定为行政区域。现在，1995年的行政区域基于1889年的边界。我们对设施服务区的种类进行了8种类型的类型，该类型基于行政领域的范围。结果，我们明确表示，三个州的设施服务领域受到行政领域和编队过程的极大影响。更重要的是受旧行政区域的影响。在Kagosima和Miyazaki展示了类似的特征。但是，这些功能之间的关系在OITA中是不同的。

项目成果

O.SEKIYA: "A study on the historical transition of administrative district (A case of Kagosima, Miyazaki and Oita)." SUMMARIES OF TECHNICAL PAPERS OF JANNUAL MEETING ARCHITECTURAL INSTITUTE OF JAPAN. No.F-1. 301-302 (1995)

O.SEKIYA：“行政区划历史变迁研究（以鹿儿岛、宫崎、大分为例）”。

梅崎 照城・友清 貴和: "研究の目的と今後の展望・地域施設計画における圏域設定手法に関する研究 その1" 日本建築学会大会学術講演梗概集E. 385-386 (1993)

Teruki Umezaki 和 Takakazu Tomokiyo：“研究目的和未来展望/区域设施规划中的区域设置方法研究第 1 部分”日本建筑学会会议学术演讲摘要 E. 385-386（1993 年）

T.TOMOKIYO: "A study on the formative process of certain administrative areas." THE RE SEARCH OF THE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING KAGOSIMA UNIVERSITY. No.35. 89-100 (1993)

T.TOMOKIYO：“对某些行政区域的形成过程的研究。”

友清貴和: "行政区域の成立過程に関する研究" 鹿児島大学工学部研究報告. 35. 89-100 (1993)

Takakazu Tomokiyo：“行政区域设立过程的研究”鹿儿岛大学工学部研究报告35。89-100（1993）。

友清貴和: "鹿児島県/宮崎県/大分県における施設・サービス圏域と行政区域の関係について" 鹿児島大学工学部研究報告. 37. 131-145 (1995)

Takakazu Tomokiyo：“鹿儿岛/宫崎/大分县的设施/服务区域与行政区域之间的关系”鹿儿岛大学工学部研究报告 37. 131-145 (1995)。