Edition with comment of the correspondence between Heinrich Besseler and Jacques Handschin (1925-1954)

带有海因里希·贝塞勒和雅克·汉钦（1925-1954）之间通信评论的版本

• 批准号: 374339592
• 负责人: Professor Dr. Thomas Schipperges
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Musikwissenschaftliches Institut
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 财政年份: 2017
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2016-12-31 至 2018-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/374339592?language=en
• 关键词: Edition; comment; correspondence; between; Heinrich

The correspondence between Heinrich Besseler and Jacques Handschin from 1925 to 1954 (the year before Handschin's death) represents a unique documentation of the history of musicology and the history of science. The continuous effectiveness of these two historians of music up to the present time is unique within the discipline. It reflects a) the constant efforts of both researchers to interpret the sources of mediecal music, b) different methodological approaches in the construction of history, and c) different ideological and culturalpolitical positioning in the Contemporary History before and after 1933 and 1945. Besseler has followed the strict philological path of his teacher in Goettingen, Friedrich Ludwig, and Handschin, influenced by Erich von Hornbostel and Robert Lachmann, has pursued the inclusion of musicethnological concepts. With the Nazi's seizure of power (so called Machtübernahme), the integration of science into the world politics is increasingly taking place (also in the personal environment of both researchers: Hornbostel and Lachmann were expelled, Besseler placed his student Manfred Bukofzer to Handschin in Basel, but when Handschin asked Besseler to write an expert opinion letter for Otto Gombosi he refused for political reasons. The correspondence illuminates also some important points of science communication, e.g. the replacement of professorship of Adolf Sandberger in Munich in 1930 or the congress of the IGMW in Barcelona in 1936. Finally, the exchange is a clear and lively reflection of the situation of the German-speaking musicology in the early post-war period. The correspondence is a central source of the history of musicology and the Contemporary History; it was closely attended to terms of both aspects but up to now only in excerpts.

海因里希·贝塞勒和雅克·汉德钦从 1925 年到 1954 年（汉德钦去世前一年）之间的通信代表了音乐学史和科学史的独特文献。这两位音乐史学家至今的持续有效性是独一无二的。它反映了a）两位研究人员对解释医学音乐来源的不断努力，b）历史建构中不同的方法论方法，以及c）不同的意识形态和文化政治。贝塞勒在1933年和1945年前后在当代史中的定位。贝塞勒遵循了他在哥廷根的老师弗里德里希·路德维希和汉钦的严格的语言学道路，受到埃里希·冯·霍恩博斯特尔和罗伯特·拉赫曼的影响，追求将音乐民族学概念纳入其中。纳粹夺取权力（所谓的 Machtübernahme），科学越来越多地融入世界政治（也在个人环境中）两位研究人员的情况：霍恩博斯特尔和拉赫曼被开除，贝塞勒将他的学生曼弗雷德·布科弗泽安置在巴塞尔的汉德钦那里，但当汉德钦要求贝塞勒为奥托·贡博西写一封专家意见信时，他出于政治原因拒绝了。这些信件也阐明了科学的一些重要观点。交流，例如 1930 年在慕尼黑更换 Adolf Sandberger 的教授职位或 2007 年在巴塞罗那举行的 IGMW 大会1936年。最后，这次交流清楚而生动地反映了战后早期德语音乐学的状况。这些信件是音乐学史和当代史密切关注的主要来源。这两方面都有，但到目前为止仅是摘录。