Exploring the Role of Urban Density in Social Housing through Graphic Anthropology in Belfast, UK

英国贝尔法斯特通过图形人类学探索城市密度在社会住房中的作用

• 批准号: 2890666
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Queen's University Belfast
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2023
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2023 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2890666
• 关键词: Exploring; Role; Urban; Density; Social

Urban density has been central to the study of cities for over a century. Usually measured as number of inhabitants, or units of housing, per km2, recent scholarship has focused on a more detailed, qualitative understanding of density, moving from the idea of the 'compact city' in the 1990s, to ideas of 'superdiversity' and 'gentle density'. Approach - The project will use a mixed-method approach, using both quantitative and qualitative methods to analyse density and mixed-use in social housing developments, of varying density, in Northern Ireland. The project will begin with historic analysis of social housing, mixed-use and density and their changes over time, both internationally and in Northern Ireland. The critical reading of Northern Irish social housing and planning policies will give an understanding of the current systems and their real-world impact. A comparison will be made to policies in other countries.We propose to use quantitative methods to study the urban morphology of a number of social housing developments in Belfast, by analysing and mapping characteristics such as: area, population, density, building height, typology, level of mixed use, provision of services, available outdoor space and the quality of the projects (Aurand, 2010; Rowley, 1996; Grant, 2002). We hope to gain an understanding of the patterns of occupation of the social housing developments. To aid the research, the quantitative analysis of density and mixed-use by other governments and professionals (Berghauser-Pont and Haupt, 2010) will be analysed and evaluated.For the qualitative analysis, we will use graphic ethnography methodologies to investigate density and mixed-use, within the urban block, street, plot and building (Porta and Romice, 2017). This will involve interviewing residents and spending time in a number of social housing developments, producing drawings to illustrate and analyse the area (Lucas, 2020). Visual anthropology (Pink, 2007) has used photography and film to understand social and anthropological phenomena, while graphic anthropology uses drawing to make 'thick descriptions' about ideas of place, memory and belonging. By combining this with architectural methods of representation and analysis, we aim to gain a rich understanding of the lived experience of the case studies. The conversations and observations from the research will be recorded and categorised before being objectively analysed and interpreted into architectural drawings. By analysing the urban morphology and level of provision of services, we can gain an understanding of the patterns of occupation of these social housing developments. On the other hand, by exercises of ethnography and graphic anthropology in a selection of these case studies, we can understand the lived experience of these patterns of density more closely. The quantitative and qualitative methodologies will be triangulated to find a relationship between the methods and results. The graphic ethnography work will be compared with the quantitative analysis to identify a correlation between the urban characteristics and the lived experiences, and therefore the effect of the former on the latter. The findings will be compared to Northern Irish planning policy to see how the developments responded to the policy and whether they met the policy's goals. We will explore how the policies could evolve, to improve quality of life in social housing developments while also sustainably meeting future demand. A comparison will also be made between Northern Ireland and other best-practice examples from across Europe with the aim to make recommendations for future social housing and density policies in Northern Ireland.Geographical Area - Belfast, Northern IrelandProject Engagement by Sector - HousingTime Period - 1970s-2020s

一个多世纪以来，城市密度一直是对城市研究的核心。通常以KM2的居民数量或住房单位来衡量，最近的奖学金集中在对密度的更详细，定性的理解上，从1990年代的“紧凑城市”的观念转变为“超级多样性”和“温和密度”的思想。方法 - 该项目将使用一种混合方法方法，同时使用定量和定性方法来分析北爱尔兰的密度和混合用途的密度和混合用途。该项目将从对社会住房，综合用途和密度的历史分析开始，及其在国际和北爱尔兰的变化。北爱尔兰社会住房和计划政策的批判性阅读将使人们了解当前的系统及其现实世界的影响。我们建议使用定量方法来研究贝尔法斯特的许多社会住房发展的城市形态，通过分析和映射特征，例如：区域，人口，密度，建筑物高度，建筑物高度，多种混合使用水平，服务空间和质量的项目（Aurand，1996年），1996年；我们希望了解社会住房发展的占领方式。为了帮助这项研究，将分析和评估其他政府和专业人员对密度和混合用途的定量分析（Berghauser-Pont and Haupt，2010年）。对于定性分析，我们将使用图形民族志方法来研究密度和混合用途，并在城市街区​​，街道，街道，街道，街道和建筑物（Porta和Romice，2017年）内。这将涉及采访居民，并花时间在许多社会住房发展中，制作图纸来说明和分析该地区（Lucas，2020年）。视觉人类学（Pink，2007年）使用摄影和电影来了解社交和人类学现象，而图形人类学则使用绘画来制作有关地点，记忆和归属观念的“厚实描述”。通过将其与代表和分析的体系结构方法相结合，我们旨在对案例研究的生活经验有丰富的了解。将对研究的对话和观察结果进行记录和分类，然后才能客观地分析并解释为建筑图纸。通过分析城市形态和服务提供水平，我们可以了解这些社会住房发展的占用方式。另一方面，通过民族志学和图形人类学的练习，在选择这些案例研究时，我们可以更仔细地了解这些密度模式的生活经验。定量和定性方法将进行三角剖分，以找到方法和结果之间的关系。图形民族志工作将与定量分析进行比较，以确定城市特征与生活经验之间的相关性，从而确定前者对后者的影响。这些调查结果将与北爱尔兰规划政策进行比较，以查看发展如何响应该政策以及他们是否实现了政策的目标。我们将探讨政策如何发展，以改善社会住房发展中的生活质量，同时可持续地满足未来的需求。还将在北爱尔兰与来自欧洲各地的其他最佳实践示例之间进行比较，目的是为北爱尔兰的未来社会住房和密度政策提出建议。地理位置 - 贝尔法斯特，北爱尔兰北爱尔兰项目 - 住房时间 - 1970年代 - 2020年代至2020年代