The distribution of phase-unlocking and phase-edge movement and its implications for phase theory

相位解锁和相位边缘运动的分布及其对相位理论的影响

• 批准号: 2890576
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: University of Cambridge
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2023
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2023 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2890576
• 关键词: distribution; phase; unlocking; edge; movement

My proposal has two goals: (i) to establish the distributions of two different strategies for extracting from phases - edge-movement and unlocking; and (ii) to amend phase theory so that it derives this. Goal-(i) matters because, contra most prior assumptions, recent work suggests both edge-movement/unlocking occur, in complementary distribution: sometypes of movement out of phases involve passing through the phase-edge; other types don't, but the phase-head mustbe Agreed with qua 'unlocked'. This applies to DP (Branan & Davis 2019, B&D; Branan 2018, B), and also CP givenevidence for edge-movement through spec-CP (e.g. van Urk 2019) but also unlocking (Rackowski & Richards 2005, VanUrk & Richards 2015). I plan to use cross-linguistic evidence to work out what determines the distribution. Priorsuggestions include a contrast between unlocking for deeply-embedded material (B&D) or for material for which edge-movement is anti-local (B), edge-movement elsewhere - but this involves DP only, and isn't applied cross-linguistically.Crucially, this also requires amending phase theory. Standard phase-theory only allows edge-movement, becausephases Transfer material out of syntax once completed - so it can't be rescued by subsequent 'unlocking'. I'd pursue anintervention-based 'phase' theory, expanding recent work reducing phasehood (Thivierge 2021) and edge-movement(Keine & Zeijlstra 2021) to (phi-)intervention. This would allow reducing locality to one notion, intervention.

我的建议有两个目标：（i）建立从阶段提取两种不同策略的分布 - 边缘移动和解锁； （ii）修改阶段理论，以使其得出。目标 - （i）很重要，因为相反的大多数先前的假设，最近的工作表明边缘运动/解锁都发生在互补分布中：移动的某个阶段的某个级数涉及穿过相边缘；其他类型没有，但是相位必须与Qua“解锁”一致。这适用于DP（Branan＆Davis 2019，B＆D; Branan 2018，b），以及通过SPEC-CP进行边缘运动的CP赠品（例如Van Urk 2019），也可以解锁（Rackowski＆Richards 2005，2005年，Vanurk＆Richards 2015）。我计划使用跨语言证据来确定决定分布的原因。 PriorSuggestions包括对深层材料解锁（B＆D）的对比，或者用于边缘移动为反本地的材料（B），其他地方的边缘移动 - 但这仅涉及DP，并且不跨语言上使用。不可用，这也需要修改相位理论。标准相位理论仅允许边缘移动，因为完成后，由于术语将材料从语法中转移出来 - 因此无法通过随后的“解锁”来挽救它。我将追求基于干预的“阶段”理论，扩大了最新的工作，从而减少了阶段性（Thivierge 2021）和边缘运动（Keine＆Zeijlstra 2021）至（PHI-）干预。这将允许将当地降低到一个概念，即干预措施。