Oppressor or Protector? Changing Perceptions of Israel's Occupation of the Syrian Golan Heights

压迫者还是保护者？

• 批准号: 2738268
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: University of Oxford
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2022
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2022 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2738268
• 关键词: Oppressor; Protector; Changing; Perceptions; Israel

My research interests encompass four intertwined threads: firstly, narratives justifying the occupation because it safeguards negative peace (i.e., the absence of violence, as coined by Johan Galtung) relative to the neighboring war. Secondly, the perception of Israel's high state capacity (compared to Syria) and advanced public goods provision (regarding healthcare, education, vaccines, or pensions) as occupation-legitimizing factors. Thirdly, the impact of such occupation legitimizations in facilitating Israeli water exploitation and settler colonialism in the Golan, and shaping the discursive construction of hydropolitics and settlements. Fourthly, the role of the Jawlani community's collective memory of the 1967 war and of Israeli human rights violations in the Golan (as documented by Al-Marsad) in upholding perceptions of the occupation as oppressive.

我的研究兴趣涵盖了四个相互交织的线程：首先，叙事为占领是合理的，因为它相对于邻近的战争，它保护了负面和平（即，约翰·加尔顿（Johan Galtung）的缺乏暴力）。其次，将以色列高州（与叙利亚相比）和先进的公共物品提供（有关医疗保健，教育，疫苗或养老金）的看法是占领因素。第三，这种职业合法化在促进以色列水的剥削和定居者殖民主义方面的影响，并塑造了氢化和定居点的话语构建。第四，Jawlani社区对1967年战争的集体记忆以及戈兰（Al-Marsad的记录）中侵犯以色列人权的行为在维持对职业的看法中的作用是压迫性的。