Cognitive Implications of Clinicians' Natural Taxonomies

临床医生自然分类法的认知意义

• 批准号: 6928607
• 负责人: Elizabeth H. Flanagan
• 金额: $ 4.83万
• 依托单位: YALE UNIVERSITY
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2003
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2003-09-15 至 2006-09-14
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/6928607
• 关键词: adult human (21+); bias; clinical research; cognition; culture; disease /disorder classification; health care personnel performance; health insurance; human subject; mental disorders; mental health personnel; postdoctoral investigator; prejudice; psychiatrist; psychiatry; psychological values; psychosocial service; social service; university student

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The goal of this series of studies is to determine the natural taxonomies that clinicians have of mental disorders and the cognitive consequences of having those taxonomies. The first series of studies (1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d) attempts to determine what are the "true" or "generic" mental disorder categories. The second series of studies investigates the organization of these generic mental disorder categories into hierarchies (2a) as well as the basic level (2b), the level of inductive privilege (2c), and essentialism and essentialist beliefs (3) within the hierarchies. Study 4 investigates the occurrence of these phenomena cross-culturally. All of the studies test whether these phenomena vary according to the profession of the participants (psychiatrists, psychologists and social workers), and level of expertise (students versus experts). Biological reductionism, by itself, will not explain psychopathology. Psychiatric classification must reflect how mental health professionals are influenced by cultural context (e.g., gender bias), economic factors (e.g., insurance reimbursement rates), and values (e.g., the subjectivity of humanism vs. objectivity of empirical science).

描述（由申请人提供）：这一系列研究的目的是确定临床医生患有精神障碍的自然分类法以及拥有这些分类法的认知后果。第一系列研究（1A，1B，1C和1D）试图确定什么是“真实”或“通用”精神障碍类别。第二系列研究调查了这些通用精神障碍类别的组织（2a）以及基本水平（2b），归纳特权（2C）的水平（2C），以及层次结构中的本质主义和本质主义信念（3）。研究4在跨文化上研究了这些现象的发生。所有研究都检验了这些现象是否根据参与者（精神科医生，心理学家和社会工作者）的专业和专业水平（学生与专家）的职业有所不同。生物还原主义本身不会解释心理病理学。精神病分类必须反映精神卫生专业人员如何受到文化背景（例如性别偏见），经济因素（例如保险报销率）和价值观（例如，人文主义的主观性与经验科学的客观性）的影响。

项目成果

Issues for DSM-V: incorporating patients' subjective experiences.

DSM-V 的问题：纳入患者的主观体验。

• DOI: 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.3.391
• 发表时间: 2007
• 期刊: The American journal of psychiatry
• 作者: Flanagan,ElizabethH;Davidson,Larry;Strauss,JohnS
• 通讯作者: Strauss,JohnS