Bohemian Identity Formation, 1620-1740

波西米亚身份的形成，1620-1740 年

• 批准号: 2447427
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: University of Cambridge
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2020
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2020 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2447427
• 关键词: Bohemian; Identity; Formation; 1620; 1740

My research will focus on the ways in which Bohemian identities were negotiated in the post-White Mountain period. It will consider identity-formation not as an isolated and inward-looking debate, but rather as a question with wider consequences in the religious, political, intellectual, and cultural spheres, and as a question that was discussed across Europe. Much of the previously-existing scholarship on identity in this period bears strong marks of the Communist-era ideology, and there have been very few studies of the authors I will focus on since 1989. Moreover, discussions of early modern Bohemian identity have tended to look primarily at textual sources, despite the fact that architecture, ceremonial, and visual depictions were crucial to such debates. Current scholarship has focused on Bohemian statements of what Bohemian-ness could be; yet the Habsburgs, the pan-Habsburg nobility, and scholars and writers from across the continent were also involved in this identity-formation. My research therefore aims to reconceptualise Bohemian identity as a questionthat wasn't insular and purely Bohemian, but rather as a negotiation that had wider implications for Europe as a whole and that sheds light religious, intellectual, and cultural debates of the period.

我的研究将重点介绍在后白山时期谈判波西米亚风格的方式。它将认为身份形成不是一个孤立的和内向的辩论，而是在宗教，政治，智力和文化领域带来更广泛后果的问题，并且是整个欧洲讨论的问题。自1989年以来，我将重点关注的作者的许多先前有关身份的奖学金都具有很强的标志。此外，关于现代波西米亚早期的身份的讨论倾向于主要在文本来源上进行文本来源，尽管事实，这是建筑，仪式，典型和视觉绘制的事实。当前的奖学金集中在波西米亚人的陈述上，即波西米亚风格可能是什么。然而，哈布斯堡，泛哈布斯堡贵族，整个大陆的学者和作家也参与了这种身份形成。因此，我的研究旨在将波西米亚风格的身份重新化为一个问题，而不是孤立的，纯粹是波西米亚风格，而是作为对整个欧洲的更广泛影响的谈判，并引发了这一时期的宗教，知识和文化辩论。