Cross Disciplinary Thinking about 'Antisocial Personality Disorder'.

关于“反社会人格障碍”的跨学科思考。

• 批准号: ES/L000911/2
• 负责人: David Jones
• 金额: $ 1.79万
• 依托单位: The Open University
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Research Grant
• 财政年份: 2017
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2017 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=ES%2FL000911%2F2
• 关键词: Cross; Disciplinary; Thinking; about; Antisocial

This seminar series is designed to promote thought and provide new perspectives on the difficulties posed by people who have major problems in their lives and their relationships - who are sometimes given the diagnosis of 'personality disorder'. At their most extreme these difficulties involve high levels of criminal offending and violence. For over 200 hundred years efforts have been made to diagnose these individuals as though they suffer from a mental disorder. Various labels have been used to describe this disorder - for example 'moral insanity', 'sociopathy', 'psychopathy' and personality disorder; with most concern in recent years being addressed to those said to suffer from 'Antisocial Personality Disorder' (ASPD). This issue began to receive a great deal of Government attention in the late 1990s, when the then Labour Government became very concerned by the case of Michael Stone who was convicted of the murder of Lin and Megan Russell in 1997. Stone's psychiatrists had recommended his discharge from a psychiatric hospital some 18 months before the murders because, although they viewed him as disturbed and dangerous, they felt that he suffered from 'ASPD' which they believed could not be treated in hospital. The Government proposed a series of initiatives that were aimed at encouraging the NHS to engage with and treat problems that were attracting the label of 'personality disorder'. They also initiated a well funded programme called the 'Dangerous and Severe Personality Disorder Programme' that aimed to treat serious offenders who were seen as suffering from this disorder. Research has suggested that these programmes have not been very successful. Nevertheless further initiatives have been planned. We believe that although there is benefit in understanding the psychology of such individuals there is a danger of too narrow a focus on the individual nature of these difficulties and of too little attention being paid to the social and cultural contexts that produce and sustain these problems. This seminar series will bring together perspectives from a range of academic disciplines along with professionals representing different aspects of the health and welfare services, and with service users who had direct experience of living with these difficulties. The first year will start with an event that focuses on historical perspectives. This is important as although the diagnosis has a substantial history going back at least 200 hundred years; that history is not always well understood and there is a danger that the lessons of that history are not utilized. We will also hold a seminar that looks at what can be learned from people's own experiences of having the diagnosis themselves and from those who work directly with people who have had that diagnosis. Another seminar will examine philosophical perspectives on the nature of these difficulties. Such diagnoses have consistently been subject to legal controversy as they raise questions as to the nature of individual responsibility. The central event of the second year will be one that examines the impact and implications of the way that these kind of problems have been represented in different kinds of media (from film, art, fiction to the news media). We suggest that media representations have been an important factor in constructing our understanding of these problems. We will also look at how useful concepts of 'personality disorder' are within the highly charged public debates about, on the one hand, the world of those who are dependent upon long term on benefits and on the other in the world of corporate greed. Cross disciplinary ideas from the first two years will flow into the events of the final year that will be used to understand and point towards solutions to specific difficulties such as the rather different relationships that men and women have towards violence and the specific issues of 'hate crimes and terror' and 'school shootings'.

该研讨会系列旨在促进思考，并为那些在生活和人际关系中存在重大问题的人（有时被诊断为“人格障碍”）所带来的困难提供新的视角。在最极端的情况下，这些困难涉及高水平的犯罪和暴力。 20000多年来，人们一直在努力诊断这些人，就像他们患有精神障碍一样。人们用各种标签来描述这种疾病，例如“道德疯狂”、“反社会”、“精神病”和人格障碍；近年来最受关注的是那些据说患有“反社会人格障碍”（ASPD）的人。这个问题在 20 世纪 90 年代末开始受到政府的广泛关注，当时的工党政府对迈克尔·斯通 (Michael Stone) 的案件非常关注，迈克尔·斯通 (Michael Stone) 于 1997 年被判谋杀林 (Lin) 和梅根·拉塞尔 (Megan Russell)。斯通的精神科医生建议将他释放谋杀发生前大约 18 个月，他从一家精神病医院被送往医院，因为虽然他们认为他精神错乱且危险，但他们认为他患有“ASPD”，他们认为这种疾病无法在医院中得到治疗。 医院。政府提出了一系列举措，旨在鼓励国民医疗服务体系（NHS）参与并治疗那些被贴上“人格障碍”标签的问题。他们还发起了一项资金充足的计划，称为“危险和严重人格障碍计划”，旨在治疗被视为患有这种疾病的严重罪犯。研究表明这些计划并不是很成功。尽管如此，已经计划了进一步的举措。我们认为，虽然了解这些人的心理是有好处的，但存在着对这些困难的个人性质过于狭隘的关注以及对产生和维持这些问题的社会和文化背景关注太少的危险。该研讨会系列将汇集来自一系列学科的观点，以及代表健康和福利服务不同方面的专业人士，以及直接经历过这些困难的服务使用者。第一年将以关注历史观点的活动开始。这一点很重要，因为尽管该诊断的历史至少可以追溯到 20000 年前；历史并不总是能够被很好地理解，并且存在着历史教训未被利用的危险。我们还将举办一个研讨会，探讨可以从人们自己的诊断经历以及直接与患有该诊断的人一起工作的人那里学到什么。另一场研讨会将从哲学角度探讨这些困难的本质。此类诊断一直受到法律争议，因为它们提出了个人责任性质的问题。第二年的中心活动将是审查此类问题在不同类型媒体（从电影、艺术、小说到新闻媒体）中的呈现方式的影响和含义。我们认为媒体报道是构建我们对这些问题的理解的一个重要因素。我们还将探讨“人格障碍”概念在激烈的公众辩论中有何用处，一方面是那些长期依赖福利的人的世界，另一方面是企业贪婪的世界。前两年的跨学科思想将融入最后一年的活动中，这些思想将用于理解和指出具体困难的解决方案，例如男性和女性对暴力的不同关系以及“仇恨”的具体问题犯罪与恐怖”和“校园枪击事件”。

项目成果

Violent States and Creative States Volume 1

暴力状态与创造性状态第 1 卷

• 发表时间: 2018
• 作者: Jones, D, W

Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology

• 发表时间: 2017
• 作者: A. Zieleniec

Moral insanity and psychological disorder: the hybrid roots of psychiatry.

• DOI: 10.1177/0957154x17702316
• 发表时间: 2017-09
• 期刊: History of psychiatry
• 影响因子: 0.6
• 作者: Jones DW

Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice

牛津犯罪学和刑事司法研究百科全书

• DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.278
• 发表时间: 2017
• 作者: Jones D