STRATEGIES FOR CARE OF THE VERY LOW BIRTHWEIGHT INFANT

极低出生体重婴儿的护理策略

• 批准号: 2546227
• 负责人: NIGEL SEFTON PANETH
• 金额: $ 53.01万
• 依托单位: MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 1996
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 1996-09-30 至 1999-09-29
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/2546227
• 关键词: African American; adolescence (12-20); child (0-11); child with disability; clinical research; ethics; health care policy; health care service evaluation; human data; human therapy evaluation; international cooperation; longitudinal human study; low birth weight infant human; neonatal intensive care; outcomes research; patient care planning; posthospitalization care; premature infant human; prognosis; statistics /biometry

This study is the first phase of a larger proposal. Phase I, under the direction of Dr Paneth, will study four large, population-based, very low birthweight cohorts with follow-up to school age. The earliest cohort is from Ontario, overseen by Dr Saigal, a second from Holland is overseen by Dr Verloove, a third from New Jersey is overseen by Dr Paneth, and a fourth from Bavaria, Germany, is overseen by Dr Wolke. The cohorts represent varying patterns of NICU treatment. Phase I aims to 1) describe and estimate current school age health and developmental outcomes of infants cared for in newborn intensive care units and 2) obtain a common multi-attribute health status assessment (using a common scoring system) on adolescent survivors not already surveyed, to describe functional status and 3) develop an assessment system for neonatal management approaches to care in the various cohorts and 4) assess the relationship, if any, between management approaches and survival in addition to short and long-term outcomes.

这项研究是较大建议的第一阶段。第一阶段，在 Paneth博士的指示将研究四个大型，基于人群的，非常非常 低出生体重队列，随后到学龄。最早的 队列来自安大略省，由萨加尔博士监督，第二秒来自荷兰 由维卢夫博士监督，新泽西州的三分之一由博士监督 Paneth和来自德国巴伐利亚的第四名由Wolke博士监督。 这些队列代表了NICU治疗的不同模式。第一阶段的目标 到1）描述和估计当前的学龄儿童健康和发展 在新生儿重症监护病房和2的婴儿的结果 获得常见的多属性健康状况评估（使用 对尚未调查的青少年幸存者的共同评分系统）， 描述功能状态和3）开发一个评估系统 新生儿管理的方法在各个队列中的护理和4） 评估管理方法之间的关系（如果有的话） 除了短期和长期结局外，生存。