Study on the fundamental contract of successive contracts

连续合同的基本合同研究

基本信息

批准号：
12620056
负责人：
NOZAWA Masamichi
金额：
$ 2.11万
依托单位：
Rikkyo University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2000
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2000 至 2002
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

In France, a general idea of contract-cadre and applications contracts is adopted in analysis of a continuous contract. This study considers legal particularity of a fundamental contract in a successive contracts by exploring following two problems, a transmission of contract and a decision of the amount of price in a sales contract.First of all, it is quite common for a party to research the others, and then, choose one out of them. This fact is evident from analys* fundamental contract in a successive contract, such as, a franchise contract and a sole agent contract. Therefore, a contract, as a rule, * be freely transferred, and agreement with a party is indispensable for its transfer. What is more, in France, it was thought that the deci* the amount of price was an effectual condition of sales of contract until the appearance of the Supreme Court judgment in 1995. However, current Japanese precedent and theory do not require this condition strictly. The reasons are as follows. In France, pe* distrust of a judge is traditionally predominant, and people tend to avoid the intervention of a judge in their private autonomy. * contrary, people in Japan incline to accept judge's subsequent intervention in what the contract did not set down at the beginning.To conclude this study, a fundamental contract is legally binding as a contract itself, and agreement with a party is essential to tran* Yet, a fundamental contract does not need to determine, precisely, the subjects that can be changed afterwards under some circumst* such as, the amount of price, and it is still valid with the judgment of the court.

法国在分析连续性合同时，采用了干部合同和应用合同的一般思想。本研究通过探讨买卖合同中合同的传递和价款数额的确定两个问题，来考虑连续合同中基础合同的法律特殊性。其他，然后从中选择一个。这一事实从特许经营合同和独家代理合同等连续合同中的基本合同分析中可以明显看出。因此，合同原则上可以自由转让，转让时必须经过当事人的同意。而且，在法国，直到1995年最高法院判决出现之前，一直认为价款的十进制是合同销售的有效条件。然而，日本现行的判例和理论并没有严格要求这一条件。。原因如下。在法国，对法官的不信任传统上占主导地位，人们倾向于避免法官干预他们的私人自治。 *相反，日本人倾向于接受法官对合同一开始没有规定的内容进行后续干预。根据本研究的结论，基本合同作为合同本身具有法律约束力，并且与当事人的协议对于交易至关重要*然而，基础合同并不需要准确地确定在某种情况*下可以变更的标的，例如价格的数额，并且经法院判决后仍然有效。