Study on the legal structure of freedom of private school and public aid to private school in Europe

欧洲私立学校自由的法律结构及对私立学校公共援助的研究

基本信息

批准号：
18530644
负责人：
YUKI Makoto
金额：
$ 1.56万
依托单位：
National Institute for Educational Policy Research
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2006
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2006 至 2007
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

The positive importance of private school existence is found in distinctiveness which differs from national and public schools in educational quality. However, for that occasion, how should private school be treated in educational policy and how should it be established legislatively in educational law.Within current legal system, private schools have "freedom of private school (Privatschulfreiheit)". The question is whether this freedom includes "freedom of education in private school" and "freedom of Tendenzbetrieb" as well as "freedom of establishing schools". Besides, why private schools are highly rated and public funds are used, in most liberal democratic countries. In regard to this case, is the aid from the public funds of those countries the same kind as that of Japan which government agencies have great discretionary powers. Alternatively, as noted in the resolution of Europe congress (1984), does it rather belong to national obligation as something which provides the practical and financial foundation to raison d'etre or social and public roles of private school, which derived from systemic safeguards of private school and legal protection of "freedom of private school". Furthermore, to what extent and degree, does the aid include public control. It'd be the matter of strained relations with "freedom of private school".Therefore, this research introduces theoretical rationalization on the importance of private school existence, "freedom of private school" and furthermore, public sphere of private school with comparative jurisprudence approach. In response, I examined legislative situation regarding freedom of private school and public aid in six countries, Netherlands, Germany, Denmark, Belgium, Spain, and Norway, especially Netherlands which is private school-dominated country, from school jurisprudential perspective. Eventually, I compile a report and published it.

私立学校存在的积极重要性在独特之处与教育质量不同的国家和公立学校不同。但是，在这个情况下，应该如何在教育政策中对私立学校进行处理，以及在教育法中如何建立立法。当前法律制度，私立学校拥有“私立学校自由（Privatschulfreiheit）”。问题是，这种自由是否包括“私立学校的教育自由”和“ Tendenzbetrieb的自由”以及“建立学校的自由”。此外，在大多数自由民主国家中，为什么要高度评价私立学校并使用公共资金。关于这种情况，这些国家的公共资金的援助与政府机构具有强大的可酌情权力的日本相同。另外，正如欧洲国会决议（1984年）所指出的那样，它宁愿属于民族义务，因为它为私立学校的系统性保障以及对“私立学自由”的法律保护提供了实用的私立学校或社会和公立角色的实践和财务基础。此外，援助在多大程度上和程度上包括公共控制。这将是与“私立学自由”关系紧张的问题。因此，这项研究介绍了关于私立学校存在的重要性，“私立学校自由”的理论合理化，此外，私立学校的公立领域具有比较的法学方法。作为回应，我检查了有关六个国家，荷兰，德国，丹麦，比利时，西班牙和挪威的私立学校和公共援助自由的立法局势，特别是荷兰，尤其是荷兰，荷兰是私立学校主导的国家，从学校的法学角度来看。最终，我编译了一份报告并发布了报告。