East-Asian Culture and Modern Law ; Comparison of Legal Culture between Japan and Korea.

东亚文化与现代法律；

基本信息

批准号：
04044011
负责人：
IMAI Hiromichi
金额：
$ 3.78万
依托单位：
Hokkaido University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for international Scientific Research
财政年份：
1992
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1992 至 1994
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

Basically, our purpose has been attained. We could successfully begin to study comparison on the legal culture of Japan and Korea, referring to the european one, from the view of legal philosophy and constitutional law. The most important result is that we can share the comprehensive scheme to proceed our project. In this short report, I shall focus on it. Hitherto, we have discussed this theme with the paradigm of a delay from the european legal model. However, we must reconsider it and present new paradigm, because both Japan and Korea is compeleted to choose between two alternatives in the economically remarkable development and success of non-european countries, especially east Asian. The first is to proceed to the further europeanization, the second is to regard our success as the result of our inherent culture and to dare to go toward the original goal. This task concems to the Confucianism-capitalism. We have regarded just protestantism and its secular ascetism as the origine of modern capitalism, while we have concluded that Confucianism had no ethos for capitalism. However a birth of capitalism in Japan and Korea compels us to examine on what to be, how to do, and what character of legal culture it has. The point to make clear is diffrence and relation between Europe with Christianity-mentality and east Asian with Confucianism-mentality in the respect of the notion of right (law) and social order. Moreover we must tackle these problems with a defferent paradigm from an old one, delay from Europe, taking into acount the fact that a part of Asian countries already could have caught up Eupopean countries. Next we should apply our basic result in each special subject. If we perform successfully, our project will acquire momentous significance for our age, in other sphere as well as jurisprudence.

基本上我们的目的就达到了。我们可以成功地开始从法哲学和宪法的角度对日本和韩国的法律文化参照欧洲法律文化进行比较研究。最重要的结果是我们可以分享进行项目的综合方案。在这篇简短的报告中，我将重点讨论这一点。到目前为止，我们已经用欧洲法律模式的延迟范式讨论了这个主题。然而，我们必须重新考虑它并提出新的范式，因为在非欧洲国家，特别是东亚国家经济上的显着发展和成功中，日本和韩国都被迫在两种选择之间做出选择。一是进一步欧洲化，二是将我们的成功视为我们固有文化的结果，敢于向最初的目标走去。这个任务涉及儒家资本主义。我们只把新教及其世俗禁欲主义视为现代资本主义的起源，而我们的结论是儒家思想没有资本主义精神。然而，资本主义在日本和韩国的诞生，迫使我们审视它的法律文化是什么、如何做以及它具有什么特征。需要明确的一点是，具有基督教心态的欧洲与具有儒家心态的东亚在权利（法律）观念和社会秩序方面的区别和联系。此外，考虑到部分亚洲国家已经赶上欧洲国家的事实，我们必须以一种不同于旧模式（即欧洲的拖延）的模式来解决这些问题。接下来我们应该将我们的基本结果应用到每个专题中。如果我们成功的话，我们的项目将对我们的时代、其他领域以及法学产生重大意义。