Rethinking the contract remedies ( 2006 )

重新思考合同补救措施（2006年）

• 批准号: 16530061
• 负责人: OKA Takashi
• 金额: $ 2.24万
• 依托单位: Gakushuin University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 2004
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2004 至 2006
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-16530061/
• 关键词: buyer's remedies; defective goods; subsequent completion of performance; reduction of the price; the Korean civil law; Chinese contract law; Taiwanese civil law; east asian private law; 不完全履行責任; 履行請求権の優越性; 東アジア普通法; 国際情報交換; 中国:韓国; 法定解除; 債務者の帰

There are many problems about the contract remedies. My study mainly focuses on the buyer's remedies when the seller has delivered a defective goods, one of the most important and heavily debated issue among those on contract remedies. I did comparative law study on the issue of the Japanese civil law, the Chinese contract law, Korean civil law, the amendments of the Korean civil code, the Taiwanese civil law and the German civil code. I was most interested in the relation among several remedies of the buyer, specifically, the relation between the buyer's right to demand the subsequent completion of performance and the right to seek for the reduction of the price.The German civil code provides that the aggrieved buyer should first demand the subsequent completion of performance by the seller before demanding the reduction of the price. I believe the German position is questionable.The seller has damaged the reliance of the buyer by furnishing the defective goods. In the situation the buyer has a legitimate concern for discontinuing the relations with the seller. Therefore the buyer should be entitled to immediately demand the seller to reduce the price without seeking for perfect performance by the seller. In other words the aggrieved buyer should choose either to demand the subsequent completion or demand the reduction of the price. The both remedies should be on the same level without any priority between them.My research reveals that this is the position adopted by the Chinese contract law authorities, the current Korean civil law, and also the revision of the Korean civil code. However, the dominant doctrine of the Taiwanese civil law is unclear.I argue through the comparative law study that the position adopted by the Chinese civil law doctrines and Korean civil law, current and revised be the right one and that it is the position to be adopted in the revision of the Japanese Civil Code.

合同救济存在很多问题。我的研究主要集中在卖方交付有缺陷货物时买方的补救措施，这是合同补救措施中最重要且争议最多的问题之一。我对日本民法、中国合同法、韩国民法、韩国民法修正案、台湾民法和德国民法等问题进行了比较法研究。我最感兴趣的是买方的几种补救措施之间的关系，特别是买方要求随后完成履约的权利与寻求降低价格的权利之间的关系。德国民法典规定，受害买方应先要求卖方履行后续义务，然后再要求降价。我认为德国的立场值得商榷。卖方提供有缺陷的货物损害了买方的信任。在这种情况下，买方有理由终止与卖方的关系。因此，买方应有权立即要求卖方降低价格，而不必寻求卖方完美履约。换句话说，受害买家应该选择要么要求后续竣工，要么要求降价。两种救济应当处于同一水平，没有优先顺序。我的研究表明，这是中国合同法当局、现行韩国民法以及韩国民法典修订所采取的立场。然而，台湾民法的主导学说并不明确。通过比较法研究，笔者认为，现行和修订后的中国民法学说和韩国民法所采取的立场是正确的，也是应该采取的立场。日本民法典修订案中采用。

项目成果

瑕疵ある目的物に対する買主の救済

买方对有缺陷物品的补救措施

• 发表时间: 2007
• 期刊: 取引法の変容と新たな展開 川井健先生傘寿記念論文集 ((日本評論社、2007年8月刊行予定)所収)
• 作者: 小柳春一郎(稻本洋之助;周藤利一との共著);松倉 耕作;松倉 耕作;K.Matsukura;松倉 耕作;松倉 耕作;松倉 耕作;松倉 耕作;松倉 耕作;K.Matsukura;K.Matsukura;K.Matsukura;K.Matsukura;松倉 耕作;松倉耕作;松倉耕作;松倉耕作;松倉耕作;松倉耕作;松倉耕作;松倉耕作;松倉 耕作;K.Matsukura;松倉耕作;松倉耕作;岡 孝
• 通讯作者: 岡 孝

The buyer's remedies in case of being delivered a defective goods

买方收到有缺陷货物时的补救措施

• 发表时间: 2007
• 期刊: Included in : Essays in celebration of Professor Takeshi KAWAFs 80^<th>-Birthday, Nihonhyoronsha (scheduled)