A fundamental study on the diagnosis of occiusal dysesthesia

咬合感觉异常诊断的基础研究

基本信息

批准号：
14571850
负责人：
TSUKIYAMA Yoshihiro
金额：
$ 2.18万
依托单位：
Kyushu University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2002
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2002 至 2003
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-14571850/
关键词：
Occlusion Sensation Dysesthesia Thickness discrimination ability Orofacial pain Temporomandibular disorders

项目摘要

There are patients who complain bite discomfort without evident occiusal abnormalities, and this is one of the frustrating problems in dentistry. Among the various etiologies of this condition, "occiusal dysesthesia", the abnormalities of occiusal sense might be considered as one of the factors. Therefore, in this study, the thickness discrimination ability in healthy young dentate indivisuals, elderly dentate indivisuals, patients with complete dentures, and occiusal dysesthesia patients. was examined to get the basic information to investigate the feature of "occlusal dysesthesia".The interdental thickness discrimination test was performed at maxillary and mandibular central incisors, canines, premolars and molars with 2-, 5-, and 10-mm thickness standard blocks. The test block, whose thickness was different from the corresponding standard block, was applied after the application of the standard block, then subjects were asked to answer whether the test block was felt thicker or thin … More ner than the standard block. The number of wrong answers was submitted to the data analysis.With regard to theexperiment for twenty healthy dentate young adults, the reproducibility was confirmed. There were statistically significant differences in the number of wrong answers between 2-and 10-mm, and 5-and 10-mm thickness, respectively (P<0,05, ANOVA). Significantly more wrong answers were observed for the test blocks thicker than the standard block, than for those thinner than the standard block (P<0.05, ANOVA). Females reported significantly more wrong answers than males in thinner test blocks for 2-and 5-mm thickness (P<0.01, rigid analysis).More wrong answers were reported for the data obtained at premolar region than that at central incisor region. As forthe elderly participants and complete denture wearers, more wrong answers were reported than the young adults. Regarding occlusal dysesthesia patients, lastly, more wrong answers were reported than the young adults. However, there was not enough data to establish the threshold for discriminating occlusal dysesthesia patients from healthy subjects. Less

有些患者抱怨咬人不适而没有证据，这是牙科中令人沮丧的问题之一。在这种情况的各种病因中，“叶子发抖”，偶有意义的异常可能被视为因素之一。因此，在这项研究中，健康的年轻齿状个体，老年人，具有完全牙齿的患者和偶尔的发抖患者的厚度歧视能力。检查以获取基本信息，以研究“咬合失调”的特征。在应用标准块之后，应用了其厚度与相应标准块不同的测试块，然后要求受试者回答测试块是否感觉更厚或较薄……比标准块更为ner。错误的答案数量已提交到数据分析中。与20个健康牙齿牙齿牙齿年轻人的实验有关，证实了可重复性。在2和10毫米和5毫米厚度之间的错误答案数量上存在统计学上的显着差异（P <0,05，ANOVA）。比标准块厚的测试块要比标准块厚的测试块要大得多的答案要大得多（P <0.05，ANOVA）。在2和5毫米厚度的较薄的测试块中，女性的答案明显比男性要多得多（p <0.01，刚性分析）。在前磨牙区域获得的数据报告的答案比中央门口区域的数据多。至于老年参与者和完整的义齿佩戴者，据报道，与年轻人相比，有更多的错误答案。对咬伤性发抖患者的重新评估，最后，报告的答案比年轻人更多。但是，没有足够的数据来确定将咬合发抖患者与健康受试者区分开的阈值。较少的