The public Debates on Energy Transition in Germany and France. Understanding ecological transformations by crossing two sociological approaches to discourse

德国和法国关于能源转型的公开辩论。

基本信息

批准号：
389691224
负责人：
Professor Dr. Reiner Keller
金额：
--
依托单位：
Lehrstuhl für Soziologie
依托单位国家：
德国
项目类别：
Research Grants
财政年份：
2018
资助国家：
德国
起止时间：
2017-12-31 至 2021-12-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/389691224?language=en
关键词：
public Debates Energy Transition Germany

项目摘要

When we compare France and Germany, conflicts, debates and energy policies have followed different trajectories, with a rather weak ecological movement and the hegemony of nuclear power on the French side, a more structured ecological movement since the 1980s and a recent mixed energy system on the German side. Recently, as a result of climate policies and European directives, significant changes have occurred, creating convergences at different scales in both countries.This research project has two main objectives. First of all, based on theoretical and methodological backgrounds, it will cross two approaches to discourse analysis, developed in both countries, and which have focused on technological risks and ecological conflicts: on the French side, the pragmatic sociology of controversy (using a specific software, Prospero) and, on the German side, the analysis of discourse related to the sociology of knowledge (SKAD). Despite their widespread use in the social sciences in France (sociology of controversies) and in Germany (SKAD) for more than a decade, they did not find the opportunity to collaborate and to overcome the linguistic barrier between their respective academic fields.The second objective is to analyze the development of public discourses around energy system and the environment, considering them over the long term (from 1970 to the present). By creating a common heuristic approach, we will organize the comparison of the argumentative trajectories followed in the two countries, paying attention to the multiple interconnections, partly due to the relationships built through the European institutions. A number of significant events have played the role of reconfigurators and the collaborative team will grasp both the differences of interpretation and the socio-technical dynamics produced in Germany as in France.To articulate strongly the two objectives, we will build a series of large digital corpora in order to analyze with the Prospero software, specifically adapted in connection with SKAD's methodological apparatus. The integrated use of the two approaches will produce dynamic maps of the sets of actors and arguments, forms of mobilization and public debates, sets of decisions and normative instruments, providing a comprehensive view on energy transition and transformations of public spheres in both countries. This collaborative research will form the touchstone of a sustainable scientific system, based on corpus and common tools, in order to observe and analyze the transformations that take place (or not) in the political and technological spheres around the energy and environmental issues in Europe.

当我们比较法国和德国时，冲突、辩论和能源政策遵循不同的轨迹，法国方面的生态运动相当弱，核电霸权，自20世纪80年代以来的生态运动更加结构化，而最近的混合能源体系则在法国方面有所体现。德国方面。最近，由于气候政策和欧洲指令，发生了重大变化，在两国不同规模上产生了趋同。该研究项目有两个主要目标。首先，基于理论和方法论背景，它将跨越两国发展起来的两种话语分析方法，这些方法都关注技术风险和生态冲突：在法国方面，争议的实用社会学（使用特定的软件，Prospero）以及德国方面与知识社会学（SKAD）相关的话语分析。尽管它们在法国（争议社会学）和德国（SKAD）的社会科学中广泛使用了十多年，但他们没有找到合作和克服各自学术领域之间的语言障碍的机会。第二个目标是分析围绕能源系统和环境的公共话语的发展，并从长期（从 1970 年至今）考虑它们。通过创建一种共同的启发式方法，我们将组织对两国所遵循的争论轨迹的比较，关注多重相互联系，部分原因是通过欧洲机构建立的关系。许多重大事件发挥了重新配置者的作用，协作团队将掌握德国和法国产生的解释差异和社会技术动态。为了强有力地阐明这两个目标，我们将建立一系列大型数字化项目语料库，以便使用 Prospero 软件进行分析，该软件专门针对 SKAD 的方法设备进行了调整。这两种方法的综合使用将产生一系列行动者和论点、动员和公共辩论形式、一系列决策和规范性文书的动态地图，从而提供关于两国能源转型和公共领域转型的全面观点。这项合作研究将形成基于语料库和通用工具的可持续科学系统的试金石，以便观察和分析欧洲能源和环境问题政治和技术领域发生（或未发生）的转变。