The Unterricht der Visitatoren (1528). Origin, significance and historical impact of the first normative group text of the Wittenberg circle

访客的教训（1528）。

• 批准号: 240376417
• 负责人: Privatdozent Dr. Joachim Bauer
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Historisches Institut
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 财政年份: 2013
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2012-12-31 至 2016-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/240376417?language=en
• 关键词: Unterricht; der; Visitatoren; 1528; Origin

The project applied for aims in the first step at producing a critical-genetic edition of the Unterricht der Visitatoren on the basis of pre-existing prints from the 16th century and newly accessible primary sources in the Main Thuringian State Archive in Weimar and in other archives and libraries. They make it possible for the first time to reconstruct the emergence of this central document of the Wittenberg Reformation in detail. The widely debated question of authorship of the Unterricht der Visitatoren can now be clearly answered: neither Philipp Melanchthon nor Martin Luther was the sole creator of the text. Rather, it must be presumed that it was a collective work which for example Johannes Bugenhagen or Hieronymus Schurff also contributed to and that their practical experiences in the visitations between 1525 and 1527 influenced the text. In order to shed more light upon the historical origins, letters from correspondences of electoral advisors from the summer and autumn of 1527 will be selected for publication in the planned edition. The newly discovered primary sources will be made accessible in digital form (scans) by the Gotha Research Library at the site of the Digital Library. The second step of the projects builds on the first and aims at elucidating the historical background, the significance and the historical reception of this normative document of the 16th century circle of Wittenberg theologians in the form of an introductory commentary. It will not be simply assumed that Luthers theology or Melanchthons integrative intentions permeate this manual for the introduction of the Reformation, but rather that the Wittenberg theologians consciously attempted in close cooperation with legal scholars and court advisors to establish a consensus which they tried to hold to in the following years. Such a consensus would, however, not have been conceivable without the territorial prince assuming episcopal functions.

该项目在第一步中申请了目标，该项目是根据16世纪的先前的印刷品以及在魏玛和其他档案中的图林格国家档案馆中新近可访问的主要来源生产关键的遗产版。和图书馆。他们使第一次重建了维滕贝格改革的中心文件的出现。现在，可以清楚地回答了Unterricht der Vistatoren的作者的广泛争议的问题：菲利普·梅兰奇顿（Philipp Melanchthon）和马丁·路德（Martin Luther）都不是文本的唯一创造者。相反，必须假定这是一项集体工作，例如，约翰内斯·本尼哈根（Johannes Bugenhagen）或赫里诺默斯·舒尔夫（Hieronymus Schurff）也为1525年至1527年之间的探视经验做出了贡献，对文本产生了影响。为了更多地阐明历史起源，将在计划版中选出1527年夏季和秋季的选举顾问信件的信件。新发现的主要资源将由数字图书馆站点的哥达研究库以数字形式（扫描）访问。这些项目的第二步是基于第一个，旨在阐明历史背景，意义和历史接受，以介绍性评论的形式形式，这是维滕贝格神学家的16世纪圈子的这一规范文件。不仅可以简单地假设Luthers神学或忧郁的综合意图渗透到本手册中引入改革，而是威特滕堡神学家有意识地尝试与法律学者和法院顾问进行密切合作，以建立共识，以建立他们试图坚持的共识在接下来的几年中。但是，如果没有主教职能的领土王子，这种共识是无法想象的。