A Randomized Controlled Study to Test the Effectiveness of Developmental Network Coaching in the Career Advancement of Diverse Early Stage Investigators

一项随机对照研究，测试发展网络辅导在不同早期研究人员职业发展中的有效性

• 批准号: 10655587
• 负责人: Elizabeth O. Ofili
• 金额: $ 68.43万
• 依托单位: MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2019
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2019-07-24 至 2024-06-30
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/10655587
• 关键词: Address; Advisory Committees; Affect; Applications Grants; Award; Biomedical Research; Capital; Career Mobility; Categories; Characteristics; Classification; Clinical and Translational Science Awards; Collaborations; Collection; Community of Practice; Data; Development; Disease; Disparity; Education; Educational Curriculum; Ego; Funding; Future; Generations; Goals; Government; Grant; Group Structure; Individual; Industry; Institution; Intervention; Journals; Knowledge; Laboratories; Link; Measures; Mentors; Mentorship; Minority; Minority-Serving Institution; Modeling; Outcome; Peer Review; Phase; Positioning Attribute; Process; Productivity; Public Health; Publications; Recommendation; Research; Research Personnel; Resource Development; Resources; Role; Science; Scientist; Self Efficacy; Shapes; Social Sciences; Structure; Study Section; Technology; Testing; Theoretical model; Time; Training; Transcend; Underrepresented Populations; United States National Institutes of Health; Writing; biomedical scientist; career; collaboratory; compare effectiveness; contextual factors; effectiveness testing; empowerment; experience; health equity promotion; human capital; improved; peer; peer networks; primary outcome; psychosocial; public health research; randomized, controlled study; secondary outcome; skills; social capital; social cognitive theory; theories; virtual

PROJECT SUMMARY This proposal addresses three of the Advisory Committee to the NIH Director (ACD) recommendations on diversity in the biomedical research workforce: It 1) expands the concept of traditional dyadic mentoring, 2) focuses on sustaining a robust network of peers, content experts, and developers, and, 3) specifically targets career transition and progress toward research independence. We propose a randomized controlled study that aims (1) To compare the effectiveness of a developmental network (DN) informed intervention plus structured grant writing coaching compared with structured grant writing coaching alone, on the research productivity of early stage investigators (ESIs) including those from underrepresented groups. (2) To determine if institutional settings influence the developmental networks of diverse ESIs. We will engage diverse early stage investigators (ESIs) including scientists from NIH research networks such as Research Centers at Minority Institutions (RCMI), Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) and Institutional Development Awards (IDeA), as well as NIH disease focused Centers of Excellence. Scientists from these NIH funded networks have pledged support to be potential developers, sponsors and possible mentors for this experimental project These networks have research resources such as pilot funding and access to laboratories and mentors, to support project investigators. The intervention will be delivered in a technology enabled virtual collaboratory, which will support synchronous and asynchronous peer, coach and content expert interaction, with data generation and collection, allowing us to examine the effects of ESI characteristics, as well as the contextual factors, including institutional context and grant writing task requirements that shape the developmental network structure and content. The Primary Outcome is Research productivity, as measured by time to submission of a NIH grant application (K, R, U, and/or Minority Supplement mechanisms). Secondary outcomes include: i) Scored grants; ii) awarded grants iii) Publication in peer reviewed journals iv) ESI developer network measures including size, composition, and structure of each ego network; v) persistence and career progression in academic, industry, government or other non- academic research. Our study will lead to new knowledge about the role of developmental networks (social capital) in advancing the career of diverse early stage investigators, including those from underrepresented groups.

项目概要 该提案针对 NIH 主任咨询委员会 (ACD) 的三名成员 关于生物医学研究队伍多样性的建议： 1) 扩展了这一概念 传统的二元指导，2) 专注于维持一个强大的同伴网络、内容 专家和开发人员，以及 3）专门针对职业转型和进步 研究独立性。我们提出一项随机对照研究，旨在 (1) 比较 发展网络 (DN) 知情干预加结构化资助的有效性 写作辅导与单独的结构化资助写作辅导的比较，关于研究 早期研究人员（ESI）的生产力，包括来自代表性不足群体的研究人员。 (2) 确定制度设置是否影响不同ESI的发展网络。 我们将聘请不同的早期研究人员 (ESI)，包括来自 NIH 研究的科学家 网络，例如少数民族机构的研究中心 (RCMI)、临床和转化 科学奖 (CTSA) 和机构发展奖 (IDeA)，以及 NIH 疾病奖 重点卓越中心。来自这些 NIH 资助网络的科学家已承诺 支持成为该实验项目的潜在开发者、赞助者和可能的导师 这些网络拥有研究资源，例如试点资金和进入实验室的机会 导师，支持项目研究人员。干预措施将以技术形式进行 启用虚拟协作，它将支持同步和异步同伴、教练 和内容专家互动，通过数据生成和收集，使我们能够检查 ESI 特征以及环境因素（包括制度环境）的影响 并授予塑造发展网络结构的写作任务要求 内容。主要成果是研究生产力，以提交论文的时间来衡量 NIH 拨款申请（K、R、U 和/或少数族裔补充机制）。中学 结果包括： i) 获得资助； ii) 授予的资助 iii) 在同行评审期刊上发表文章 iv) ESI 开发者网络衡量标准，包括每个自我的规模、组成和结构 网络; v) 在学术、工业、政府或其他非领域的坚持和职业发展 学术研究。我们的研究将带来关于发展作用的新知识 网络（社会资本）促进不同早期研究人员的职业生涯，包括 来自代表性不足的群体。

项目成果

Cancer Prevention and Diagnosis Knowledge among Spanish-speaking Older Latino/as Residing in Tampa, Florida.

讲西班牙语的老年拉丁裔/居住在佛罗里达州坦帕的癌症预防和诊断知识。

• 发表时间: 2022
• 影响因子: 3.2
• 作者: Carrion, Iraida V;Neelamegam, Malinee;Estapé, Tania;Doering, Tracy;Snyder, Olivia;Tollinchi, Ebony;Estapé, Jorge
• 通讯作者: Estapé, Jorge