Crossroads: Using decision making strategies to develop high impact content for training in rigor and transparency.

十字路口：使用决策策略来开发高影响力的内容，以进行严格和透明的培训。

基本信息

批准号：
10722510
负责人：
Salena Brody
金额：
$ 9万
依托单位：
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS
依托单位国家：
美国
项目类别：
财政年份：
2023
资助国家：
美国
起止时间：
2023-08-01 至 2026-07-31
项目状态：
未结题

来源：
https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/10722510
关键词：
Address Adopted Adoption Animals Area Attention Basic Science Beauty Biomedical Research Clinical Research Cognitive Cognitive Science Data Data Collection Data Reporting Decision Making Development Education Educational Curriculum Educational Models Educational Status Educational workshop Electronics Error Sources Evaluation Experimental Designs Foundations Funding Grant Growth Guidelines Hospitals Human Humanities Individual Institution Intervention Knowledge Laboratories Lead Learning Literature Location Measures Methods Modeling Nature Neurosciences Neurosciences Research Operating Rooms Operative Surgical Procedures Outcome Participant Phase Philosophy Postdoctoral Fellow Procedures Process Program Development Psychology Publications Reporting Reproducibility Research Research Personnel Resources Running Safety Scholarship Science Scientist Seasons Self-Examination Social Psychology Standardization Surgeon System Texas Time Training Training Activity Trust Uncertainty Universities War Work World Health Organization clinical practice curriculum development data management decision research design digital digital platform equity, diversity, and inclusion experience experimental study frontier graduate student heuristics improved in vivo interest pedagogy pressure professor programs psychologic remediation training opportunity undergraduate student wasting

Address Adopted Adoption Animals Area Attention Basic Science Beauty Biomedical Research Clinical Research Cognitive Cognitive Science Data Data Collection Data Reporting Decision Making Development Education Educational Curriculum Educational Models Educational Status Educational workshop Electronics Error Sources Evaluation Experimental Designs Foundations Funding Grant Growth Guidelines Hospitals Human Humanities Individual Institution Intervention Knowledge Laboratories Lead Learning Literature Location Measures Methods Modeling Nature Neurosciences Neurosciences Research Operating Rooms Operative Surgical Procedures Outcome Participant Phase Philosophy Postdoctoral Fellow Procedures Process Program Development Psychology Publications Reporting Reproducibility Research Research Personnel Resources Running Safety Scholarship Science Scientist Seasons Self-Examination Social Psychology Standardization Surgeon System Texas Time Training Training Activity Trust Uncertainty Universities War Work World Health Organization clinical practice curriculum development data management decision research design digital digital platform equity, diversity, and inclusion experience experimental study frontier graduate student heuristics improved in vivo interest pedagogy pressure professor programs psychologic remediation training opportunity undergraduate student wasting

展开

项目摘要

PROJECT SUMMARY Scientific research can benefit from healthy self-examination and agile, data-driven corrections. The “Reproducibility Crisis” has necessitated structural changes amongst publishers and funders, but individual scientists have not received the level of training necessary to fix common issues in rigor and inadequacies in transparent reporting that contribute to replication problems. While the crisis has prompted numerous workshops, opinion pieces, and quantified replication evaluations in neuroscience, the development of cohesive and high impact training opportunities has not yet occurred. The inaccessibility of training modules makes it difficult to formally train scientists whether they are beginners (e.g., undergraduate students) or seasoned researchers (e.g., tenured professors) without an unrealistic individual time commitment from the scientists themselves. The development of stand-alone educational units covering issues of the scientific process from the philosophical foundations of science all the way to the reporting of data and methods in a transparent manner are critical to making this training both accessible and acceptable to researchers. At the University of Texas at Dallas, we have assembled a team of stakeholders and supporters with rich backgrounds in basic neuroscience research, psychology research and clinical practice, education curricula development, pedagogy research, and the reproducibility crisis itself to build three high impact educational units that will be integrated into the digital platform developed by the Creating an Educational Nexus for Training in Experimental Rigor (CENTER) group. Our focus is on three critical and practical areas of the crisis: (1) Recording of data and methods (2) Exploratory vs confirmatory research, and (3) Interpreting and reporting findings.

项目摘要科学研究可以受益于健康的自我检查和敏捷，数据驱动的校正。这 “可重复性危机”在出版商和资金中具有必要的结构性变化，但是个人科学家尚未收到在严格和不足之处解决常见问题所需的培训水平透明报告会导致复制问题。尽管危机促使许多研讨会，但舆论部分和神经科学中的量化复制评估，凝聚力和高度的发展影响培训机会尚未发生。训练模块的无法访问使得很难正式培训科学家是初学者（例如，本科生）还是经验丰富的研究人员（例如，终身教授）没有科学家本身的不切实际的个人时间承诺。独立教育单位的发展，涵盖了哲学的科学过程问题科学基础一直以透明方式报告数据和方法对使研究人员既可以访问又可以接受。在得克萨斯大学达拉斯分校，我们有组建了一个在基本神经科学研究领域具有丰富背景的利益相关者和支持者团队，心理学研究和临床实践，教育课程发展，教育学研究和可重复性危机本身是建立三个高影响力教育单位，这些单位将融入数字平台由创建一个教育联系，用于实验性严谨（中心）组的培训。我们的重点是危机的三个关键和实用领域：（1）记录数据和方法（2）探索性与确认研究，以及（3）解释和报告结果。