Understanding Older Adults' Perspectives on How to Incorporate Life Expectancy in Cancer Screening

了解老年人对如何将预期寿命纳入癌症筛查的看法

• 批准号: 8958982
• 负责人: Nancy Schoenborn
• 金额: $ 12.15万
• 依托单位: JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2015
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2015-08-15 至 2017-05-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/8958982
• 关键词: Address; Adult; Advocate; Age; Age-Years; Area; Benefits and Risks; Cause of Death; Characteristics; Clinic; Clinical; Communication; Communities; Comorbidity; Data; Development; Early Diagnosis; Elderly; Fostering; Health; Health Status; Individual; Internal Medicine; Intervention; Interview; Knowledge; Life; Life Expectancy; Malignant Neoplasms; Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Career Development Award; Morbidity - disease rate; Patients; Population; Recommendation; Recruitment Activity; Relative (related person); Research; Research Methodology; Research Personnel; Risk; Role; Sampling; Screening for cancer; Structure; Suggestion; Surveys; Time; United States National Institutes of Health; Variant; Work; base; cancer care; career development; clinical practice; functional status; improved; innovation; mortality; novel; older patient; patient oriented; preference; public health relevance; screening; tool; uptake

 DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Cancer is the second leading cause of death among older adults. Cancer screening can lower cancer- related mortality and morbidity but may be associated with significant harms and burdens in older adults. Research has shown that it may take 10 years for people who are screened for cancer to benefit (have lower risk of dying from cancer), compared to those who are not screened. However, harms, including complications and burdens from screening, can occur in the short term. Therefore, cancer screening in older adults with limited life expectancy may inappropriately subject them to harm with they are unlikely to live long enough to benefit. Compared to younger populations, older adults of the same age can be much more heterogeneous in their health status and life expectancies. Older adults with very limited life expectancy are still frequently screened for cancer. Healthy older adults with relatively long life expectancies-who may still benefit from cancer screening-are under-screened. Therefore, it is critically important to communicate and incorporate life expectancy in cancer screening among older adults so that individualized risks and benefits of screening are presented for patients to make informed decisions aligned with their preferences. How to best communicate and incorporate life expectancy in cancer screening of older adults is not well- defined. Multiple tools incorporating individuals' functional status and co-morbidities have been developed to predict life expectancy among older adults. However, it is not clear how frequently or how appropriately these tools are used in clinical practice. One barrier to their uptake is that clinicians have difficulty discussing life expectancy with their older patients. Clinicians lack a clear understanding of older adults' preferences for talking about life expectancy in cancer screening. In this context, it is essential to better understand how older adults perceive the role of life expectancy in cancer screening and what their preferences are for life expectancy communication with their clinicians in the screening context. This proposal fills an important research gap by aiming to better understand older adults' preferences regarding how to communicate and incorporate life expectancy in cancer screening. Because little is known about this area, we will first use a qualitative in-depth study to understand the range of patient perspectives in Aim 1; we will then determine the applicability of these perspectives in a larger, nationally representative population in Aim 2. This innovative work addresses the knowledge gap in understanding older adults' preferences for how to communicate and incorporate life expectancy in cancer screening. The proposed project will provide the much needed empiric data to inform the development of best practices and interventions to improve individualized, patient-centered cancer screening for older adults.

 描述（由申请人提供）：癌症是老年人死亡的第二大原因。癌症筛查可以降低癌症相关的死亡率和发病率，但可能会给老年人带来重大伤害和负担。研究表明，癌症筛查可能需要 10 年的时间。与未接受癌症筛查的人相比，接受癌症筛查的人可以受益数年（死于癌症的风险较低）。但是，短期内可能会出现筛查带来的危害，包括并发症和负担。在较旧的与年轻人相比，预期寿命有限的成年人可能会受到不适当的伤害，因为他们不太可能活得足够长，因此，同龄的老年人在健康状况和预期寿命方面可能存在很大差异。预期寿命有限的预期寿命相对较长的健康老年人（仍可能受益于癌症筛查）因此，在老年人癌症筛查中沟通和纳入预期寿命至关重要。以便个性化风险和筛查的好处是让患者根据自己的喜好做出明智的决定。如何在老年人的癌症筛查中最好地沟通和纳入预期寿命，目前尚未开发出多种结合个人功能状态和合并症的工具。然而，尚不清楚这些工具在临床实践中的使用频率和适当程度，其中一个障碍是新教徒很难与老年患者讨论预期寿命。老年人谈论预期寿命的偏好在这种情况下，有必要更好地了解老年人如何看待预期寿命在癌症筛查中的作用，以及他们在筛查方面与忠诚者进行预期寿命沟通的偏好。该提案填补了一项重要的研究空白。旨在更好地了解老年人关于如何沟通和将预期寿命纳入癌症筛查的偏好，因为对此领域知之甚少，我们将首先使用定性深入研究来了解目标 1 中患者的观点范围；然后我们将确定这些观点的适用性目标 2 中具有更大的全国代表性人口。这项创新工作解决了了解老年人对如何沟通和将预期寿命纳入癌症筛查的偏好方面的知识差距。拟议的项目将提供急需的经验数据，为癌症筛查的发展提供信息。改善老年人个体化、以患者为中心的癌症筛查的最佳实践和干预措施。