Innovators Network-Population factors, Organizational Capacity, Workflow and Resources (INPOWR)

创新者网络-人口因素、组织能力、工作流程和资源（INPOWR）

• 批准号: 10181051
• 负责人: Sarah LeLeiko Cutrona
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: EDITH NOURSE ROGERS MEMORIAL VETERANS HOSPITAL
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2018
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2018-04-01 至 2021-03-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/10181051
• 关键词: Boston; Caring; Characteristics; Climate; Collection; Competence; Data; Data Element; Development; Diffusion; Employee; Evaluation; Foundations; Funding; Future; Goals; Group Structure; Interview; Investments; Knowledge; Leadership; Measures; Methods; Motivation; Outcome; Participant; Pathway interactions; Persons; Phase; Population; Recommendation; Reporting; Resources; Seeds; Site; Specialist; Surveys; Time; Training; Typology; Veterans; Work; Workplace; data management; expectation; experience; flexibility; improved; innovation; instrument; meetings; pleasure; programs; response; stem; success; support network

The QUERI/HSR&D centers in Bedford/Boston, Durham, Palo Alto, and Portland jointly submit this proposal titled “Innovators Network-Population factors, Organizational capacity, Workflow and Resources (INPOWR)”. The energy and strength of the Innovators Network stem from the diversity of Network participants and sites nationwide and from the broad range of projects led by front-line employees. To assess impact, therefore, our team must begin by ascertaining the goals and motivations of participants, then use this knowledge to understand how success is defined across these varied settings and projects. Only with this understanding will it be possible to accurately measure impact. Using mixed-methods, our evaluation will answer three questions: 1) Who participates in Innovators Network? 2) Why do they participate? (what are their expectations for impact at the site and project level?) and 3) What is the impact of Innovators Network participation? Within the 33 Innovators Network sites (VA facilities), there can be multiple S-S-S projects. To answer the above three questions, we must perform evaluations at the level of the site and at the level of the projects (within-site). We propose the following Specific Aims: Aim 1 Examine Innovators Network site characteristics and expectations for impact (SITE and PROJECT level). Subaim 1a. Using quantitative analyses, identify organizational factors associated with Network participation (e.g. applying to be a Network site; applying for S-S-S Investment funds). Subaim 1b. Through qualitative interviews with Site Leadership, Innovation Specialists and select project leads, describe site-level experiences with participation in the Network, define expectations for participation and explore in what ways, for whom, and in what contexts expectations for participation were met. Subaim 1c. Develop a Typology of S-S-S project characteristics, expected impacts and recommended metrics. Aim 2. Measure the impact of Innovators Network SITE participation, using mixed- methods. Subaim 2a. Use qualitative data from interviews with Network participants to identify and understand site-level impacts of participation. Subaim 2b. Use existing survey data to identify impacts of site participation on employee experience. Subaim 2c. Develop, pilot and implement a measure of Innovation Climate in Network sites. Aim 3. Measure the impact of Innovators Network PROJECTS, including factors associated with success, sustainability and return on investment (ROI). Subaim 3a. Using Aim1 metrics for success, measure observed vs expected project outcomes Subaim 3b. Use qualitative data from interviews to deepen understanding of project impacts Subaim 3c. Conduct a Return on Investment (ROI) analysis on selected projects. Our Team, led by our Project Coordinating Center (Bedford) is organized around four Expert Groups. This ‘Expert Group’ structure draws on the unique expertise housed at each of our four sites. Quantitative Data Management will be led by Dr. George Jackson (Durham); Quantitative Analysis will be led by Dr. Sarah Cutrona (Bedford); ROI will be led by Dr. Anita Vashi (Palo Alto) and Qualitative Analysis will be led by Dr. Anaïs Tuepker (Portland).

贝德福德/波士顿，达勒姆，帕洛阿尔托和波特兰共同提交的Queri/Hsr＆D中心 该提案标题为“创新者网络人口涉及因素，组织能力，工作流程 和资源（Inpowr）。创新者网络的能量和强度源于 网络参与者和网站的多样性在全国以及广泛的项目中 由一线员工。因此，要评估影响，我们的团队必须首先确定 参与者的目标和动机，然后利用这些知识来了解成功 在这些不同的设置和项目中定义。只有这种理解才会 使用混合方法，我们的评估将回答三个 问题：1）谁参加创新者网络？ 2）为什么他们参加？ （什么是 他们对现场和项目层面的影响的期望？）和3） 创新者网络参与？在33个创新者网站（VA设施）中， 可以是多个S-S-S-S项目。要回答以上三个问题，我们必须执行 在网站级别和项目级别（地点内）的评估。我们建议 以下特定目的：目标1检查创新者网站网站特征和 对影响的期望（站点和项目级别）。 Subaim 1A。使用定量分析， 确定与网络参与相关的组织因素（例如 网站；申请S-S-S-S投资基金）。 Subaim 1B。通过定性采访 通过网站领导，创新专家和精选项目主管，描述站点级别 参与网络的经验，定义参与的期望和探索 以什么方式，为谁以及在什么情况下满足了参与的期望。 Subaim 1C。开发S-S-S项目特征，预期影响并推荐的类型学 指标。目标2。使用混合 - 测量创新者网站参与的影响 方法。 Subaim 2a。使用与网络参与者的访谈中的定性数据来识别 并了解参与的站点级别的影响。 Subaim 2b。使用现有的调查数据 确定现场参与对员工经验的影响。 Subaim 2C。开发，飞行员和 在网络站点中实施创新气候的测量。目标3。衡量的影响 创新者网络项目，包括与成功，可持续性相关的因素 投资回报率（ROI）。 Subaim 3a。使用AIM1指标成功，测量观察到的VS 预期的项目成果Subaim 3B。使用访谈中的定性数据加深 对项目的理解影响Subaim 3C。对投资回报率（ROI）分析 选定项目。我们的团队由我们的项目协调中心（贝德福德）领导 大约四个专家小组。这个“专家小组”结构借鉴了独特的专业知识 在我们的四个站点中的每个站点中都安置。定量数据管理将由乔治博士领导 杰克逊（达勒姆）；定量分析将由Sarah Cutrona博士（贝德福德）领导； ROI会 由Anita Vashi博士（Palo Alto）领导，定性分析将由AnaïsTuepker博士领导 （波特兰）。

项目成果

The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Innovators Network: Evaluation design, methods and lessons learned through an embedded research approach.

• DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2020.100477
• 发表时间: 2021-06
• 期刊: Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
• 作者: Vashi AA;Orvek EA;Tuepker A;Jackson GL;Amrhein A;Cole B;Asch SM;Gifford AL;Lindquist J;Marshall NJ;Newell S;Smigelsky MA;White BS;White LK;Cutrona SL
• 通讯作者: Cutrona SL