Systematic Review Core (SRC)/Ian D. Coulter

系统审查核心 (SRC)/Ian D. Coulter

• 批准号: 8573690
• 负责人: Ian Douglass Coulter
• 金额: $ 33.72万
• 依托单位: RAND CORPORATION
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2013
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2013-09-30 至 2017-06-30
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/8573690
• 关键词: Autacoids; Award; California; Caring; Categories; Conflict (Psychology); Copyright; Effectiveness; Ensure; Evidence based practice; Grant; Healthcare; Housing; Institutes; Intervention; Literature; Meta-Analysis; Modeling; National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health; Online Systems; Ontario; Physicians; Policy Maker; Process; Publishing; Reporting; Research; Review Literature; Safety; Services; System; Technical Expertise; United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Writing; base; cost; systematic review; tool

Core Description This Core, the Systematic Review Core (SRC) will conduct all the systematic reviews (SRs) and literature reviews for the 4 Projects. These will range from a full systematic review and possible meta-analysis for Project 1 Clinician Based Appropriateness to less extensive reviews for Projects 2,3 and 4 where we are not anticipating being able to conduct meta-analysis. The reviews will be conducted by an expert team at the Samueli Institute with cooperation ofthe Southern California Evidence-Based Practice Center (SCEPC) located at the RAND Corporation. The Samueli Institute has developed a robust, efficient and rigorous process for conducting systematic reviews and has conducted reviews in almost all the major categories of CAM [1-15] using a process referred to as the Rapid Evidence Assessment ofthe Literature or REAL¿ process. Briefly, Samueli Institute has automated the review process on a web-based platform known as Mobius Analytics, Systematic Review System SRS (Copyright 2003-2009 Mobius Analytics Inc., Ottawa, Ontario) to increase the efficiency of the process. A key advantage of the REAL process is that Samueli Institute has developed a system to not only assess internal validity when looking at quality but also external validity and model validity criteria. This process has been developed as a streamlined systematic review system that is more objective and criteria-based, increasing inter-rater reliability in the review process and creating a model that is able to produce evidence reports in a more rapid fashion at a reduced cost than most systematic reviews. The SCEPC is one ofthe premier centers for conducting SRs in the US. It has conducting numerous previous reviews in CAM. The SCEPC was previously awarded a three year grant from NCCAM, administered through AHRQ, to provide technical expertise and conduct systematic reviews for CAM. The SCEPC has collaborated with Samueli Institute on several systematic reviews in the past.

核心描述 该核心，即系统审查核心 (SRC)，将对 4 个项目进行所有系统审查 (SR) 和文献审查，范围从针对项目 1 临床医生的适当性的全面系统审查和可能的荟萃分析。对项目 2,3 和 4 进行广泛审查，我们预计无法进行荟萃分析。这些审查将由 Samueli 研究所的专家团队与南加州循证实践中心合作进行。位于 RAND 公司的 Samueli 研究所 (SCEPC) 开发了一套稳健、高效和严格的流程来进行系统审查，并使用称为快速的流程对几乎所有主要的 CAM 类别进行了审查 [1-15]。文献或真实的证据评估¿简而言之，Samueli Institute 在名为 Mobius Analytics 的系统审核系统 SRS（版权所有 2003-2009 Mobius Analytics Inc.，安大略省渥太华）上实现了审核流程的自动化，以提高审核流程的效率。 REAL 流程的优势在于 Samueli 研究所开发了一个系统，不仅可以在质量方面评估内部有效性，还可以评估外部有效性和模型有效性标准。该流程已开发为更客观的简化系统审查系统。基于标准，提高审查过程中评估者间的可靠性，并创建一个模型，能够以比大多数系统审查更低的成本更快地生成证据报告。 SCEPC 是美国进行 SR 的主要中心之一，之前曾在 CAM 中进行过多次审查。SCEPC 之前曾获得 NCCAM 的为期三年的资助，通过 AHRQ 管理，为 CAM 提供技术专业知识和系统的行为审查。与 SCEPC 进行了合作。 过去曾与 Samueli 研究所合作进行过几次系统评价。