Nursing Homes Response to Quality Indictors Publication
疗养院对质量指标发布的反应
基本信息
- 批准号:7409988
- 负责人:
- 金额:$ 25.1万
- 依托单位:
- 依托单位国家:美国
- 项目类别:
- 财政年份:2004
- 资助国家:美国
- 起止时间:2004-05-01 至 2011-04-30
- 项目状态:已结题
- 来源:
- 关键词:AccountingAdministratorAdmission activityAdoptedAdoptionAdvertisingAffectBehaviorCaringCase MixesClientClinicalComplexCongressesCreamDataData AnalysesData SetDeteriorationDimensionsDiscipline of NursingEducational process of instructingEnrollmentEnvironmentEnvironmental Risk FactorExpenditureFundingGoalsHealth Care CostsHealth PlanningHome Nursing CareHospitalsIncentivesInformation SystemsInstitute of Medicine (U.S.)KnowledgeLeadLocationMeasuresMedicalMedicareMonitorNursing HomesOutcomeOwnershipPatientsPersonnel ManagementPhysiciansPoliciesPractice GuidelinesPrincipal InvestigatorProcessProtocols documentationProviderPublicationsPublishingQuality IndicatorQuality of CareRecommendationRegression AnalysisRegulationRelative (related person)ReportingResource AllocationResourcesRewardsScoreSkilled Nursing FacilitiesSurveysSystemTechniquesTestingUnited States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid ServicesUrinary IncontinenceWorkbasecostdesignexperiencehealth care service organizationimprovedinsightinstrumentprogramsresponse
项目摘要
DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Quality of care in many of the nation's nursing homes has been long recognized as inadequate despite efforts to reform and strengthen regulations. A more recent CMS policy initiative designed to improve quality relies on publication of nursing home quality report cards, which allow patients to easily compare relative quality ranking of competing nursing homes. Publication of such report cards is expected to provide nursing facilities with positive incentives to improve the quality of care they offer. Report cards may, however, also lead nursing homes to adopt "dysfunctional" strategies, such as "cream skimming" or "teaching to the test". Such strategies may adversely affect quality and access to nursing home care. The empirical evidence about the response of health care organizations in general, and nursing homes in particular, to such report cards is scant and inconclusive. In the proposed study we will examine the response of nursing homes to the publication of the CMS quality report cards and will answer two questions: 1) What factors determine which strategies nursing homes adopt in response to quality reports? And 2) what is the impact of such strategies on quality?
The proposed study will compare data from the period prior to publication of the report to data from a period following publication to examine changes in behavior of nursing homes. We will create a comprehensive data set with information about: 1) the strategies that nursing homes adopted following publication and their views of the quality report cards (based on a national survey of nursing homes), 2) quality before and after publication of the reports measured along different dimensions, including those published in the reports, others that are not published, and hotel quality (based on MDS data merged with Medicare enrollment data and data on resource use obtained from nursing home cost reports) and 3) information about changes in admission profiles (MDS data). Statistical regression techniques will be used to analyze the data and test specific hypotheses.
描述(由申请人提供):尽管努力改革和加强法规,但长期以来,美国许多疗养院的护理质量一直被认为是不足的。最近一项旨在提高质量的 CMS 政策举措依赖于发布疗养院质量报告卡,该报告卡使患者能够轻松比较竞争疗养院的相对质量排名。此类成绩单的发布预计将为护理机构提供积极的激励,以提高其提供的护理质量。然而,成绩单也可能导致疗养院采取“功能失调”的策略,例如“撇脂”或“应试教学”。此类策略可能会对疗养院护理的质量和可及性产生不利影响。关于医疗保健组织,特别是疗养院对此类报告卡的反应的经验证据很少且不确定。在拟议的研究中,我们将检查疗养院对 CMS 质量报告卡发布的反应,并回答两个问题:1)哪些因素决定疗养院针对质量报告采取哪些策略? 2)此类策略对质量有何影响?
拟议的研究将比较报告发布前一段时间的数据与报告发布后一段时间的数据,以检查疗养院行为的变化。我们将创建一个全面的数据集,其中包含以下信息:1)疗养院在发布后采取的策略以及他们对质量报告卡的看法(基于对疗养院的全国调查),2)报告发布前后的质量从不同维度进行衡量,包括报告中公布的、其他未公布的以及酒店质量(基于与医疗保险登记数据合并的 MDS 数据以及从疗养院成本报告中获得的资源使用数据)以及 3)有关变化的信息入学资料(MDS 数据)。统计回归技术将用于分析数据并测试特定假设。
项目成果
期刊论文数量(9)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
Factors influencing nursing home response to quality measure publication: A resource dependence perspective.
影响疗养院对质量衡量标准发布的反应的因素:资源依赖的角度。
- DOI:10.1097/hmr.0b013e3181e23d64
- 发表时间:2010
- 期刊:
- 影响因子:2.5
- 作者:Zinn,JacquelineS;Weimer,DavidL;Spector,William;Mukamel,DanaB
- 通讯作者:Mukamel,DanaB
Strategic orientation and nursing home response to public reporting of quality measures: an application of the miles and snow typology.
战略定位和疗养院对质量措施公开报告的响应:里程和雪类型学的应用。
- DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00781.x
- 发表时间:2008
- 期刊:
- 影响因子:3.4
- 作者:Zinn,JacquelineS;Spector,WilliamD;Weimer,DavidL;Mukamel,DanaB
- 通讯作者:Mukamel,DanaB
Is There Evidence of Cream Skimming Among Nursing Homes Following the Publication of the Nursing Home Compare Report Card?
- DOI:10.1093/geront/gnp062
- 发表时间:2009-12-01
- 期刊:
- 影响因子:5.7
- 作者:Mukamel, Dana B.;Ladd, Heather;Zinn, Jacqueline S.
- 通讯作者:Zinn, Jacqueline S.
Does risk adjustment of the CMS quality measures for nursing homes matter?
- DOI:10.1097/mlr.0b013e31816099c5
- 发表时间:2008-05-01
- 期刊:
- 影响因子:3
- 作者:Mukamel, Dana B.;Glance, Laurent G.;Mosqueda, Laura
- 通讯作者:Mosqueda, Laura
Interpreting market share changes as evidence for effectiveness of quality report cards.
将市场份额变化解释为质量报告卡有效性的证据。
- DOI:10.1097/mlr.0b013e31812f56bb
- 发表时间:2007
- 期刊:
- 影响因子:3
- 作者:Mukamel,DanaB;Weimer,DavidL;Mushlin,AlvinI
- 通讯作者:Mushlin,AlvinI
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}
DANA B MUKAMEL其他文献
DANA B MUKAMEL的其他文献
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
{{ truncateString('DANA B MUKAMEL', 18)}}的其他基金
Home Health, ADRD, Telehealth, and Patient Outcomes
家庭健康、ADRD、远程医疗和患者结果
- 批准号:
10513268 - 财政年份:2022
- 资助金额:
$ 25.1万 - 项目类别:
Home Health, ADRD, Telehealth, and Patient Outcomes
家庭健康、ADRD、远程医疗和患者结果
- 批准号:
10689783 - 财政年份:2022
- 资助金额:
$ 25.1万 - 项目类别:
Staffing and Health Outcomes in Nursing Homes for Residents with and without Dementia
疗养院中患有和未患有痴呆症的居民的人员配备和健康状况
- 批准号:
10621699 - 财政年份:2020
- 资助金额:
$ 25.1万 - 项目类别:
Staffing and Health Outcomes in Nursing Homes for Residents with and without Dementia
疗养院中患有和未患有痴呆症的居民的人员配备和健康状况
- 批准号:
10171551 - 财政年份:2020
- 资助金额:
$ 25.1万 - 项目类别:
Staffing and Health Outcomes in Nursing Homes for Residents with and without Dementia
疗养院中患有和未患有痴呆症的居民的人员配备和健康状况
- 批准号:
10368160 - 财政年份:2020
- 资助金额:
$ 25.1万 - 项目类别:
Improving quality report cards through inclusion of consumers preferences
通过纳入消费者偏好来提高报告卡质量
- 批准号:
9103796 - 财政年份:2016
- 资助金额:
$ 25.1万 - 项目类别:
相似海外基金
Characteristics and outcomes for hospitalized patients with methamphetamine and opioid co-use: Identifying opportunities for hospital-based addiction services tailored to co-use
甲基苯丙胺和阿片类药物同时使用的住院患者的特征和结果:确定针对共同使用的医院成瘾服务的机会
- 批准号:
10677138 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 25.1万 - 项目类别:
Hospital adaptation and resiliency for infected and uninfected patients during respiratory viral surge events: from seasonal influenza to COVID-19
呼吸道病毒激增事件期间受感染和未受感染患者的医院适应和弹性:从季节性流感到 COVID-19
- 批准号:
10540801 - 财政年份:2021
- 资助金额:
$ 25.1万 - 项目类别:
Frailty Assessment in the Intensive Care Unit and Short Term Outcomes in Older Patients (FRAIL-STOOP)
重症监护病房的衰弱评估和老年患者的短期结果 (FRAIL-STOOP)
- 批准号:
9125710 - 财政年份:2015
- 资助金额:
$ 25.1万 - 项目类别:
Tailored Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment for Medical Int
量身定制的筛查、简短的干预以及转诊至医疗机构的治疗
- 批准号:
9094247 - 财政年份:2014
- 资助金额:
$ 25.1万 - 项目类别:
Tailored Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment for Medical Int
量身定制的筛查、简短的干预以及转诊至医疗机构的治疗
- 批准号:
8699925 - 财政年份:2014
- 资助金额:
$ 25.1万 - 项目类别: