Accuracy and Compliance in Daily Reports of Risk Behavior

风险行为每日报告的准确性和合规性

基本信息

批准号：
7425795
负责人：
TIMOTHY L MCAULIFFE
金额：
$ 57.66万
依托单位：
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN
依托单位国家：
美国
项目类别：
财政年份：
2006
资助国家：
美国
起止时间：
2006-06-01 至 2010-05-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/7425795
关键词：
AIDS prevention Accounting Adoption Adult Agreement Attention Attitude Back Behavior assessment Behavioral Cognitive Collection Computer Assisted Condition Daily Data Data Collection Data Reporting Databases Development Disease Doctor of Philosophy Drug usage Effectiveness of Interventions Electronics Event Failure Frequencies Gold HIV Hand Individual Internet Intervention Intervention Studies Intervention Trial Interview Investigation Life Mails Measurement Measures Memory Methodology Methods Minor Modeling Nature Numbers Outcome Outcome Measure Paper Participant Patient Self-Report Persons Prevention Research Prevention intervention Procedures Public Health Questionnaires Randomized Rate Recruitment Activity Reporting Research Resources Respondent Retrospective Studies Risk Risk Behaviors Risk Reduction Sampling Self-Administered Sex Behavior Source Specific qualifier value Standards of Weights and Measures Survey Methodology Surveys Techniques Technology Technology Assessment Telephone Testing Time TimeLine Woman base comparison group computerized cost design diaries high risk behavior improved instrument men prospective research and development research study response safer sex sound success theories

项目摘要

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Accurate self-report data on individual sexual risk practices are critical for judging the efficacy of HIV risk- reduction interventions. These reports are most often collected by retrospective assessment. More attention is now being devoted to survey design and administration, including widespread use of computer-assisted self-interviews (CASI). However, relatively little research has systematically evaluated whether these methods improve the accuracy of retrospective self-report data. In our recent study, daily sexual activity diaries were used to study the effects of commonly-used partner-specific versus aggregate question formats and modes of data collection SAQ, CASI, and audio-CASI on the accuracy of retrospective sexual behavior reports. Findings indicated that CASI modes and partner-specific format resulted in greater accuracy than more traditional survey methods. However, the rate of error in the data remained relatively high (between 30% and 38%), when compared to the diary-based measures. Despite their potential for yielding highly-detailed and recall-error free data, the use of traditional (paper) diaries has been limited in HIV research, mainly due to problems of maintaining participant compliance, missing or inconsistent data, and the costs of implementation. The proposed study will examine whether electronic diaries both telephone and internet-based can mitigate the obstacles associated with paper diaries. 302 men and 302 women will be randomized to electronic and paper diary conditions for reporting sexual activity over a 3-month period. Rates of compliance, accuracy and costs relating to electronic diaries will be compared to those for paper diaries. Determining the feasibility of using diary-based measures to evaluate outcomes of HIV prevention interventions is a critical aspect of our study; however, we acknowledge that retrospective surveys will remain the standard mode for collecting outcome data in HIV research. Therefore, we also propose to evaluate the accuracy of sexual self-reports obtained from 2 audio-CASI assessments using question formats consistent with cognitive theory partner-specific and timeline follow-back when the data are compared to the diary-based measures for the same period. By developing methods to ascertain the accuracy of risk outcome measures, the proposed study seeks to improve our ability to evaluate the efficacy of HIV prevention models, thus supporting public health strategies for identifying effective HIV interventions.

描述（由申请人提供）：个人性风险行为的准确自我报告数据对于判断艾滋病毒风险降低干预措施的有效性至关重要。这些报告通常是通过回顾性评估收集的。现在更多的注意力集中在调查设计和管理上，包括广泛使用计算机辅助自我访谈（CASI）。然而，系统评估这些方法是否提高回顾性自我报告数据准确性的研究相对较少。在我们最近的研究中，每日性活动日记被用来研究常用的特定伴侣问题格式与聚合问题格式以及数据收集 SAQ、CASI 和音频 CASI 模式对回顾性行为报告准确性的影响。研究结果表明，CASI 模式和合作伙伴特定格式比更传统的调查方法具有更高的准确性。然而，与基于日记的测量相比，数据的错误率仍然相对较高（30% 至 38% 之间）。尽管传统（纸质）日记有可能产生高度详细且无回忆错误的数据，但其在艾滋病毒研究中的使用受到限制，这主要是由于维持参与者依从性、数据缺失或不一致以及实施成本等问题。拟议的研究将研究基于电话和互联网的电子日记是否可以减轻与纸质日记相关的障碍。 302 名男性和 302 名女性将被随机分配到电子和纸质日记条件下，以报告 3 个月内的性活动。电子日记的合规率、准确性和成本将与纸质日记进行比较。确定使用基于日记的措施来评估艾滋病毒预防干预结果的可行性是我们研究的一个关键方面；然而，我们承认回顾性调查仍将是收集艾滋病毒研究结果数据的标准模式。因此，我们还建议评估从 2 次音频 CASI 评估中获得的性自我报告的准确性，使用与特定伴侣认知理论和时间线跟进一致的问题格式，将数据与基于日记的测量进行比较。时期。通过开发确定风险结果测量准确性的方法，拟议的研究旨在提高我们评估艾滋病毒预防模型功效的能力，从而支持确定有效的艾滋病毒干预措施的公共卫生战略。