Leon Battista Alberti (1404-1472): Tradition, Innovation and Interdisciplinarity in a Renaissance Polymath

莱昂·巴蒂斯塔·阿尔贝蒂（Leon Battista Alberti，1404-1472）：文艺复兴时期博学者的传统、创新和跨学科性

• 批准号: AH/D501644/1
• 负责人: Martin McLaughlin
• 金额: $ 2.99万
• 依托单位: University of Oxford
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Research Grant
• 财政年份: 2006
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2006 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FD501644%2F1
• 关键词: Leon; Battista; Alberti; 1404; 1472

The aim is to fulfil the need for a comprehensive monograph on Alberti: the book's title is Leon Battista Alberti (1404-1472): Tradition, Innovation and Interdisciplinarty in a Renaissance Polymath. The research context is one in which many initiatives have been undertaken in Alberti studies since 1990, leading up to the centenary in 2004. These have taken the form of interdisciplinary conferences and the published proceedings, and also two major editorial initiatives, one in Italy, one in France, to publish in the next ten years Alberti's complete works (the first three volumes appeared in 2002-03). Yet, no comprehensive monograph in any language has been published to offer a rounded picture of this multi-faceted writer. Cecil Grayson, who established the editions of Alberti's vernacular worth's (Bari, 1960-73), never wrote a definitive monograph, though his collected articles were published shortly before his death: Studi su Leon Battista Alberti (Olschki, 1996). In English, there have been only three recent books: by Joan Kelly Gadol (Chicago, 1969), ivlark Jarzombek (Cambridge, MA, 1989) and Anthony Grafton (Harmondsworth, 2000). None of the three books were by experts in Italian literature, and none of them cover the vast body of literary texts written by Alberti. Gadol's book was largely concerned with Alberti the art theorist, and only a few pages of her final chapter (pp. 213-40) were devoted to his literary works. Jarzombek's work has received little attention from scholars since his understanding of Renaissance Latin and Italian seems deeply flawed. Anthony Grafton is a distinguished historian: his Alberti book is largely concerned with the history of ideas and culture, devoting most space to the architectural treatise (hence its subtitle lyiaster Builder of the Italian Renaissance), and to Della famiglia, whereas the other three vernacular dialogues receive barely three pages. In private conversation, Grafton agrees that there is a strong case for a monograph on Alberti written from a literary perspective. Italian scholarship on Alberti shows a similar pattern. The enhanced understanding of the writer's importance has been underlined by the appearance of a new journal entirely devoted to his works, Albertiana (1998-), and by several major A conferences, but the only recent monographs are limited in scope: Ponte's Leon Battista Alberti. Umanista e scrittore (Genoa, 1981), deals with the literary not the technical works, and Contarino's L B Alberti moralista (Caltanissetta, 1991) treats ethical not literary issues. Among other single-authored worths, new light was shed on Atberti's Florentine years by Luca Boschetto, Leon Battista Alberti e Firenze (Olschki, 2000), paralleled by Stefano Borsi's work on Alberti the antiquarian in Rome in his Leon Battista Alberti e Roma {Florence, 2003). Rinaldo Rinaldi's 'Melancholia Christiana". Studi sulle fonti di Leon Battista Alberti (Olschki, 2002) is a collection of articles, the central ones concentrating on just one work (Momus), while Francesco Furlan's Studia Albertiana (Paris-Turin, 2003) is another collection of essays, providing insights into some of the philological and genre problems surrounding the texts. The rest of recent scholarship on the author is in the form of articles and conference proceedings. The Atti of three 1990s conferences appeared in 1999, 2000 and 2001 (see Case for Support), and the proceedings of the many centenary conferences of 2004 have just started to appear. Potential applications and benefits of the outcome: the completed monograph will be of use to students and researchers in the general area of Renaissance studies, and in the particular fields of Italian, Latin (and Greek) literary studies, reception of classical culture, art history, and architectural history.

目的是满足对艾伯蒂（Alberti）的全面专着的需求：这本书的标题是莱昂·巴蒂斯塔·艾伯蒂（Leon Battista Alberti）（1404-1472）：文艺复兴时期的传统，创新和跨学科。研究背景是自1990年以来在阿尔伯蒂研究中采取许多倡议的一种，直到2004年到达百年。这些倡议以跨学科会议和已发表的诉讼的形式，以及两项主要的编辑计划，在意大利，一项在法国，一项在未来十年的《艾尔伯特（Alberti）完整的作品》中（第一位三年级的2002年）出版（2002年）。但是，尚未出版任何语言的全面专着，可以提供这位多方面作家的圆形图片。塞西尔·格雷森（Cecil Grayson）建立了艾伯蒂（Alberti）的《白话价值》（Bari）的版本（Bari，1960-73），从未写过确定的专着，尽管他的收集的文章是在他去世前不久发表的：Studi Su Leon Battista Alberti（Olschki，1996年）。用英语，最近只有三本书：琼·凯利·加多尔（Joan Kelly Gadol）（芝加哥，1969年），伊夫拉克·贾尔佐贝克（Ivlark Jarzombek）（马萨诸塞州剑桥，1989年）和安东尼·格拉夫顿（Anthony Grafton）（Harmondsworth，2000年）。这三本书都不是意大利文学专家，它们都没有涵盖艾伯蒂（Alberti）撰写的大量文学文本。加多尔的书在很大程度上关注艺术理论家艾伯蒂（Alberti），她的最后一章中只有几页（第213-40页）致力于他的文学作品。自从他对文艺复兴时期拉丁文的理解和意大利人的理解似乎严重有缺陷以来，贾佐贝克（Jarzombek）的作品几乎没有受到学者的关注。安东尼·格拉夫顿（Anthony Grafton）是一位杰出的历史学家：他的艾伯蒂（Alberti）书在很大程度上关注思想和文化的历史，将大部分空间献给建筑论文（因此是意大利文艺复兴时期的副标题莉亚斯特建造者），而对德拉·法姆利亚（Della Famiglia）则是della famiglia的，而其他三个vernacular the vernacular对话则获得了最少的三页。在私人对话中，格拉夫顿同意，从文学角度写的关于艾伯蒂的专着有很大的论据。意大利艾伯蒂（Alberti）的奖学金显示出类似的模式。一本完全专门介绍他的作品《艾伯利亚那（Albertiana）》（1998年）的新期刊的出现以及几个少校的大会会议的出现，对作者的重要性的增强理解得到了强调，但是唯一的唯一专着在范围中受到限制：庞特的莱昂·巴蒂斯塔·艾伯蒂（Leon Battista Alberti）。 Umanista e Scrittore（热那亚，1981年），涉及文学而不是技术著作，Contarino的L B Alberti Moralista（Caltanissetta，1991）将其视为善良的而不是文学问题。在其他单人作者的价值中，卢卡·博塞托（Luca Boschetto），莱昂·巴蒂斯塔（Leon Battista Alberti E Firenze）在阿特伯蒂（Atberti）的佛罗伦萨（Florentine）时代（Olschki，2000年）露出了新的光，Stefano Borsi由Stefano Borsi在罗马（Leon Battista Alberti e Roma Roma of Leon Battista alberti e Roma Roma Roma Rome the Alberti the Alberti the Alberti）的工作以及2003年的罗马（Rome in Leon Battista Alberti e Roma）的作品。 Rinaldo rinaldi的“忧郁的Christiana”。SutiiSulle Fonti di Leon Battista Alberti（Olschki，2002年）是一系列文章，仅关注一项工作（Momus），而Francesco Furlan的艾伯利亚夫妇（Paris-Turrin，2003年）则在partery of Essery中，这些杂物是一个问题，这些杂物是一个问题。作者的其余奖学金以文章和会议的形式出现在1999年，2000年和2001年的三个1990年代会议上（请参阅2004年的许多百年会议的案例），2004年的许多百年会议刚刚开始出现了对整个领域的潜在研究。拉丁语（和希腊）文学研究，古典文化，艺术史和建筑史的接受。

项目成果

Alberti's 'Canis': Structure and sources in the portrait of an artist as a Renaissance dog

阿尔伯蒂的“犬”：文艺复兴时期艺术家肖像中的结构和来源

• 发表时间: 2011
• 期刊: Albertiana
• 作者: McLaughlin, M

Proceedings of the British Academy Volume 167, 2009 Lectures

英国科学院院刊第 167 卷，2009 年讲座

• DOI: 10.5871/bacad/9780197264775.003.0011
• 发表时间: 2011
• 作者: Clancy T

Unité thématique et structurelle dans le De familia d'Alberti

阿尔伯蒂家族的结构与结构

• 发表时间: 2013
• 作者: McLaughlin, M

Alberti and the classical canon

阿尔贝蒂与古典经典

• 发表时间: 2009
• 作者: McLaughlin, M

Pessimismo stoico e cultura classica nel Theogenius dell'Alberti

泰奥根尼乌斯·德尔阿尔贝蒂的悲观主义与经典文化

• 发表时间: 2010
• 作者: McLaughlin, M