Insecure lives and the policy disconnect: How multiple insecurities affect Levelling Up and what joined-up policy can do to help

不安全的生活和政策脱节：多种不安全因素如何影响升级以及联合政策可以提供哪些帮助

• 批准号: ES/Z000149/1
• 负责人: Rebecca Tunstall
• 金额: $ 37.42万
• 依托单位: London School of Economics and Political Science
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Research Grant
• 财政年份: 2024
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2024 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=ES%2FZ000149%2F1
• 关键词: Insecure; lives; policy; disconnect; How

IntroductionMillions of UK residents are worrying about multiple issues such as money, housing, health and caring responsibilities. Individual insecurities may build up and combine. They may prevent households using their opportunities, including the primary education, adult skills training and work opportunities which Levelling Up aims to provide. They may harm well-being, and limit productivity. Perceived insecurities may have different psychological and behavioural effects to other kinds of disadvantages. Insecurities may mean some people may not be able to benefit from Levelling Up, and Levelling Up may not be able to achieve its full potential.Policy background: Many past local growth and regeneration projects have been very successful, but many have not met all their goals, and progress has been more difficult for some so-called 'left behind' areas and so-called 'hard to reach' groups of people. Multiple insecurities may provide a partial explanation. Some key individual insecurities have grown in prevalence over time. The research questionsOur two main research questions are: 1. How do people's experiences of multiple insecurities in a place impact their ability to participate in and benefit from Levelling Up?2. How can policies and policymakers reduce insecurities and join-up better to improve well-being, opportunity and Levelling Up? In addition, we want to know how many people experience multiple insecurities, in what combinations, where are they, and what are the implications for those who experience them? And what is the lived and felt experience of multiple insecurities, what policies and stakeholders are implicated in these risks, and what can they do together to de-risk lives and aid Levelling Up? Research methodsWe will focus on certain insecurities (food insecurity, debt, income fluctuations, eviction or loss of housing, problems with health and caring responsibilities), and outcomes relevant to Levelling Up (performance at primary school, skills, employment and wellbeing). Over ten months, we will explore multiple insecurities using mixed methods, including:-Discussion with policymakers about multiple insecurities, and what they know and want to learn about them,-Evidence reviews of individual and multiple insecurities, their prevalence and impacts, and of promising approaches in addressing multiple insecurities,-Quantitative analysis on the same topics across the UK using Understanding Society supplemented by other sources,-New qualitative data collection, which will involve researchers talking with 24-30 people experiencing multiple insecurities in three diverse areas in England about their lived experience of insecurities, the effects, and who might be able to mitigate them, with an artist drawing alongside to record responses and to elicit new insights, and other visual and story methods,-Discussion with policymakers and people identified as potential 'risk influencers' on what they could do to 'derisk' people's lives, based on personas created from case study stories.We have considered and tried to mitigate risks, and ethical concerns. We have some evidence of policymaker and practitioner interest in our ideas, although its origins did not allow comprehensive consultation.Outputs and disseminationThe call demands thought leadership, and we hope to provide this through developing and evidencing a new interdisciplinary concept, 'multiple insecurity'. We have built dissemination to some policymakers into the project. We will also produce final presentations to policymakers; a final report and policy briefs; mapping, and other visual and story information; academic seminars, conference papers; working papers and journal articles; and material for deposit with UK Data Archive. We hope to see growth in the use of the concept, citation of our work, some changes in Levelling Up policy and some changes in practice, as a result of our work.

介绍英国居民有数百万人担心货币，住房，健康和关怀责任等多个问题。个人不安全感可能会建立并结合起来。他们可能会阻止家庭利用自己的机会，包括升级的基本教育，成人技能培训和工作机会。它们可能会损害福祉，并限制生产力。感知的不安全感可能与其他类型的缺点具有不同的心理和行为影响。不安全感可能意味着某些人可能无法从升级中受益，并且升级可能无法实现其全部潜力。背景：许多过去的当地增长和再生项目都非常成功，但是许多人还没有实现所有目标，而对于某些所谓的“留下了“落后”领域和所谓的“艰难的“艰难接触”人群，人们更加困难。多种不安全感可能会提供部分解释。随着时间的流逝，一些关键的个人不安全感在患病率上越来越多。研究提问，两个主要的研究问题是：1。人们在某个地方的多种不安全感的经历如何影响他们参与并受益于升级的能力？2。政策和政策制定者如何减少不安全感并更好地加入以改善福祉，机会和升级？此外，我们想知道有多少人遇到多种不安全感，哪种组合，它们在哪里，对那些体验他们的人有什么影响？而且，多种不安全感的生活和感觉到的经历是什么，哪些政策和利益相关者涉及这些风险，他们可以一起做些什么来降低生活风险和帮助升级？研究方法将重点关注某些不安全感（粮食不安全，债务，收入波动，驱逐或丧失住房，健康和关怀责任问题）以及与升级相关的结果（小学，技能，就业和福祉的表现）。 Over ten months, we will explore multiple insecurities using mixed methods, including:-Discussion with policymakers about multiple insecurities, and what they know and want to learn about them,-Evidence reviews of individual and multiple insecurities, their prevalence and impacts, and of promising approaches in addressing multiple insecurities,-Quantitative analysis on the same topics across the UK using Understanding Society supplemented by other sources,-New qualitative data收藏集将涉及与研究人员与24-30人交谈，在英格兰的三个不同领域经历多种不安全感，谈论他们的生活经历，效果，以及谁可能能够减轻他们的生活经验，并与艺术家一起记录回应并引起新的见解，并引起新的见解，以及其他视觉和故事的认同者，对他们的潜在风险，以及对他们的潜在风险，''生活，基于案例研究故事创造的角色。我们已经考虑并试图减轻风险和道德问题。我们有一些证据表明决策者和实践者对我们的思想的兴趣，尽管其起源不允许全面咨询。输出和传播呼叫要求思想领导才能，我们希望通过发展和证明新的跨学科概念“多重不安全感”来提供这一点。我们已经将一些政策制定者分发到该项目中。我们还将向决策者制作最终演讲；最终报告和政策摘要；映射以及其他视觉和故事信息；学术研讨会，会议论文；工作论文和期刊文章；和用英国数据存档存款的材料。我们希望看到该概念的使用，引用我们的工作，升级政策的一些变化以及由于我们的工作而变化的一些变化。