ENDURE: Inequalities, Community Resilience and New Governance Modalities in a Post-Pandemic World

忍受：大流行后世界的不平等、社区复原力和新的治理方式

• 批准号: ES/X000788/1
• 负责人: James Foley
• 金额: $ 29.53万
• 依托单位: Glasgow Caledonian University
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Research Grant
• 财政年份: 2022
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2022 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=ES%2FX000788%2F1
• 关键词: ENDURE; Inequalities; Community; Resilience; New

We study the medium and long-term societal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, not only to understand what happened, but to ensure an "equitable, resilient and sustainable future" in line with the UN Research Roadmap for COVID recovery. Specifically, by bringing together an interdisciplinary team based in some of the countries that were hardest hit by the pandemic, we address the following:1- EquityThrough in-depth micro-level research, the project directly examines why some populations were affected more adversely than others due to the pandemic by virtue of factors such as socioeconomic status, age, ethnic background and cultural practices. The aim of the research is to: * understand existing inequity and accompanying processes of (de)mobilization during and after the COVID19 crisis. Empirically, we examine how disadvantaged groups (women, minorities, low-skilled workers, indigenous peoples, poorer communities) could or could not mobilize to demand their rights. We are interested in (de-)mobilizations for health equity as well as different types of mobilizations that have emerged in the context of the pandemic during lockdowns and afterward and that reveal alternative ways of expressing public demands. * to explore the ethical considerations underpinning policy responses. We explore the extent to which policies were adequate in addressing social vulnerabilities and ask how policies may be made more equitable to ensure resilience in the future.2- ResilienceThrough multi-scalar research, we explore how societies can be made inherently resilient to cope with mounting and emerging challenges. We focus on the following dimensions of resilience:* We use an experimental survey to examine how the pandemic impacted public attitudes towards inequality and the effect of institutional contexts on societal resilience.* Different disciplines have proposed different understandings of resilience in recent years. Despite the volume of research interest in a host of academic fields, scholars rarely talk across the disciplines. As the ultimate result of ENDURE, we posit that a harmonized paradigm and theory of resilience is required to address the many challenges that global society is currently facing in the context of COVID-19. We seek to take steps toward bridging disciplinary canyons. Building upon dialogue and cross-disciplinary conversations about the ontological, epistemological, and normative aspects of studying resilience across disciplines and fields of research, we want to pull the pieces together to propose a unified, multifaceted and multidisciplinary view of the concept of resilience. We believe such an approach is both propitious and timely.3- SustainabilityWhile equity and resilience create the future we want, the sustainability of society can only be achieved through proper governance and a healthy media environment. By studying governance mechanisms and communication through transatlantic partnerships, we develop evidence-informed advice and mechanisms for recovery and political participation processes. We examine:* governance structures in responding COVID-19 in terms of lockdowns and vaccines and analyze how COVID-19 led to different forms of governance models; * International cooperation during the Covid-19 pandemic, especially regarding the capacity and legitimacy of International Organizations (IOs),* the extent to which crisis governance measures impacted democracy and freedom and the long-term transformations of society that resulted.* the extent to which effective, ethical and accurate communication was undertaken by government officials, health professionals, researchers, scientific advisers, and the media.

我们研究 COVID-19 大流行的中长期社会影响，不仅是为了了解发生了什么，也是为了确保根据联合国新冠病毒恢复研究路线图实现“公平、有弹性和可持续的未来”。具体来说，通过汇集一些受疫情影响最严重的国家的跨学科团队，我们解决了以下问题：1- 公平性通过深入的微观研究，该项目直接探讨了为什么某些人群受到的影响比其他人群更严重另一些则是由于社会经济地位、年龄、种族背景和文化习俗等因素造成的。该研究的目的是：*了解新冠病毒危机期间和之后现有的不平等和伴随的动员（去）动员过程。根据经验，我们研究了弱势群体（妇女、少数民族、低技能工人、土著人民、贫困社区）如何能够或不能动员起来要求自己的权利。我们对健康公平的（去）动员以及在封锁期间和之后在大流行背景下出现的不同类型的动员感兴趣，这些动员揭示了表达公众需求的其他方式。 * 探索支撑政策反应的道德考虑。我们探讨政策在多大程度上足以解决社会脆弱性，并询问如何使政策更加公平，以确保未来的复原力。2-复原力通过多尺度研究，我们探索如何使社会具有内在的复原力，以应对日益严重的社会问题。以及新出现的挑战。我们重点关注复原力的以下几个维度：*我们通过一项实验调查来研究疫情如何影响公众对不平等的态度以及制度环境对社会复原力的影响。*近年来，不同学科对复原力提出了不同的理解。尽管许多学术领域的研究兴趣浓厚，但学者们很少跨学科进行讨论。作为 ENDURE 的最终结果，我们认为需要一个统一的范式和复原力理论来解决全球社会目前在 COVID-19 背景下面临的许多挑战。我们寻求采取措施弥合纪律鸿沟。基于跨学科和研究领域研究复原力的本体论、认识论和规范方面的对话和跨学科对话，我们希望将各个部分整合在一起，提出关于复原力概念的统一、多方面和多学科的观点。我们相信这种做法既有利又及时。3-可持续性虽然公平和韧性创造了我们想要的未来，但社会的可持续性只能通过适当的治理和健康的媒体环境来实现。通过研究跨大西洋伙伴关系的治理机制和沟通，我们为恢复和政治参与进程制定循证建议和机制。我们研究：* 在封锁和疫苗方面应对 COVID-19 的治理结构，并分析 COVID-19 如何导致不同形式的治理模型； * Covid-19大流行期间的国际合作，特别是在国际组织（IO）的能力和合法性方面，*危机治理措施影响民主和自由的程度以及由此产生的社会长期变革。*政府官员、卫生专业人员、研究人员、科学顾问和媒体进行了有效、道德和准确的沟通。

项目成果

The Antinomies of Insurgency: The Case of the Scottish National Party

叛乱的矛盾：苏格兰民族党的案例

• DOI: 10.1111/1467-923x.13314
• 发表时间: 2023
• 期刊: The Political Quarterly
• 作者: Foley J