起業家的国家と革新的官僚制度

创业型国家和创新型官僚机构

基本信息

批准号：
15F15760
负责人：
インタラカムナードピー
金额：
$ 0.77万
依托单位：
National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows
财政年份：
2015
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2015-11-09 至 2017-03-31
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

The fellowship project researched how different East Asian countries organize their innovation policies; and especially, how they maintain dynamic policy capacities to respond to techno-economic developments and socio-economic challenges.In the first stage, an original analytical framework; an evolutionary approach to analyzing state and policy capacities;was developed that looks at the main potential factors (from the perspective of the evolutionary theory) influencing the success of innovation policy, both in terms of coming up with novel policy ideas (innovation in policy) and implementing them with desired impact (supporting innovation through policy): the routines and capacities of innovation policy organizations, the location and autonomy of these organizations in a policy system, organizational variety (of routines and capacities) of the specific national policy systems.In the second stage, the framework was used in case studies of innovation policy evolutions in three East Asian economies: Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, R.O.C. Research showed that while most of the innovation policy and governance rhetoric of these economies is increasingly emulating the US and European discourses on entrepreneurial state and societal challenges oriented innovation policies, the specific institutional and organizational legacies of these economies seem to lead to the emergence of a specific form of innovation policy governance where political actors and institutions for top-down governance are much more central and explicit than in US or Europe.

该奖学金项目研究了不同东亚国家如何组织其创新政策；特别是他们如何保持动态政策能力以应对技术经济发展和社会经济挑战。在第一阶段，一个原始的分析框架；发展了一种分析国家和政策能力的演化方法，着眼于（从演化理论的角度）影响创新政策成功的主要潜在因素，无论是在提出新颖的政策理念（政策创新）方面并以预期的效果实施它们（通过政策支持创新）：创新政策组织的惯例和能力、这些组织在政策体系中的位置和自主权、具体国家政策体系的组织多样性（惯例和能力）。第二阶段，该框架被用于日本、韩国和台湾三个东亚经济体创新政策演变的案例研究研究表明，虽然这些经济体的大多数创新政策和治理言论越来越多地效仿美国和欧洲关于创业型国家和社会挑战导向的创新政策的论述，但这些经济体特定的制度和组织遗产似乎导致了创新政策治理的具体形式，其中政治参与者和自上而下治理的机构比美国或欧洲更加核心和明确。