The Historical Study of Citizen's Participation in the Japanese Museum

公民参与日本博物馆的历史研究

基本信息

批准号：
14510316
负责人：
TAKIBATA Mariko
金额：
$ 0.96万
依托单位：
Otemon Gakuin University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2002
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2002 至 2003
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

First, I examine the history of citizens'participation at Osaka Museum of Natural History, Yokosuka City Museum and Ooisawa Natural Museum. Toshiro Ito proposed that in order for a museum to be public goods, citizens'participation in survey and study should be indispensable. Discussion should be continued about Ito's proposalon public goods : how the citizens that participated in joint surveys or studies organized by museum professionals changed their recognition and actions, and also transformed the museum and the community.Secondly, I criticize two reports presented by the Japanese Association of Museum : "Museum : Conversation & Cooperation", and "Desirable Image of the Museum". As both reports lacked a clear concept of museum, they presented not higher standards but minimum standards. "The standard for the facilities and operation of public museums (Standard 48)" has been revised by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology. On the other hand, museums are expected to aim for higher level due to the pressure of evaluation. Museum professionals have long demanded improvements in their working conditions and tax privileges for private museums.Japanese museums have not made their raison d'etre clear in the last 50 years, so they find it difficult to win public patronage. For example, we can consider museum as a system for the redistribution of cultural capital. It isn't sophisticated evaluation that is being looked for at present, but a fundamental examination why museums exist, and how can we make the law or standard for museum management.

首先，我考察了大阪自然博物馆、横须贺市博物馆和大泽自然博物馆的公民参与历史。伊藤敏郎提出，博物馆要想成为公共产品，就必须有公民参与调查研究。伊藤关于公共产品的建议值得继续讨论：参与博物馆专业人员组织的联合调查或研究的公民如何改变他们的认识和行动，也改变了博物馆和社区。其次，我批评日本协会提出的两份报告博物馆：“博物馆：对话与合作”和“博物馆的理想形象”。由于两份报告都缺乏明确的博物馆概念，因此提出的不是更高的标准，而是最低的标准。《公立博物馆设施及运营标准（标准48）》已由文部科学省修订。另一方面，迫于评估压力，博物馆也希望向更高水平迈进。博物馆专业人士长期以来一直要求改善私人博物馆的工作条件和税收优惠。日本博物馆在过去50年里一直没有明确其存在的理由，因此很难赢得公众的支持。例如，我们可以将博物馆视为文化资本重新分配的系统。当前所寻求的不是复杂的评价，而是对博物馆为何存在、如何制定博物馆管理的法律或标准进行根本性的审视。