A study of ethical sensitivity influence factor of nurses

护士伦理敏感性影响因素研究

• 批准号: 18592311
• 负责人: ADACHI Miyuki
• 金额: $ 2.6万
• 依托单位: Gifu University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 2006
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2006 至 2007
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-18592311/
• 关键词: ethicalsensitivity; ethicalstandard; decision making; 倫理的意志決定; 看護倫理

【Purpose】 A purpose of this study is to find the standard of judgment of ethical problems;1) ethic problem, making clear how an ethic principle of "benefit" "autonomy" "cordiality" "justice" "loyalty" influences it as a choice good factor in case of decision making of an ethical problem. 2) "benefit" "autonomy" etc and how does an ethic principle of "the justice" "loyalty" influence decision making of an ethical judgement.3) a standard to judge the ethic problem that Rev. nursing faces on practice side nursing face on practice side.【Result and discussion】 I pushed forward analysis of findings of last year and selected the factor which influenced sensitivity of an ethic carefully. The factor which formed a value system and improvement of sensitivity of an ethic or two categories with the factor which had an influence on a fall were extracted mainly.On the basis of result, I made sensitivity measurement standard plan of an ethic. 2) choice good factor:I extracted a standard and an ethic … More principle of judgment of an ethic than data provided by the above.The extracted principle was "autonomy" "justice" "fairness". The recognition of a principle of a main ethic demanded from a medical person and the judgment on the basis of it were done.However, by the situation and ability of nursing individual to face, judgment of an ethic does it on the basis of all principles, but by the situation which principle of priority was different whether treated it. I pushed forward analysis more, and what was recognized more powerfully than other principles became clear about "autonomy" in an ethic principle. In addition, an object of an interview, nursing of ward duty there was not the person who recognized a problem about "justice" whether was because was it. This point was to be different from Rev. American clinical nursing greatly. The other side American nursing caught a problem of an ethic more broadly. In addition, I recognized that practice ability itself of Rev. nursing was existence of an ethic powerfully. 3) question paper making:On the basis of extracted contents and precedence study, I set the scene where I thought to really face it in the medical spot and made a virtual question paper. I did the included principle with "autonomy" "benefit" "faithful loyalty" "justice". Less

[目的]本研究的目的是找到道德问题的判断标准； 1）道德问题，清楚地表明，“福利”“自治”“自治”“ solciality”“ justical”“义务”“忠诚度”如何将其作为选择的良好因素，以实现道德问题的决策。 2）“福利”“自主权”等，以及“正义”“忠诚”的道德原则如何影响道德判断的决策。3）判断护士牧师在实践中练习侧面护士面对的道德问题的标准。 [结果和讨论]我推动了去年发现的分析，并选择了仔细影响道德灵敏度的因素。主要提取了对跌倒的因素或两类伦理的敏感性的改善的因素，主要提取了。根据结果​​，我制定了伦理的灵敏度测量标准计划。 2）选择良好的因素：我提取了一种标准和道德……与上述数据相比，伦理学的判断原则更多。提取的原则是“自治”“正义”“公平”。根据所有原则，根据护士个人面对的情况和能力，对医务人员和法官要求的主要道德原则的认可是根据所有原则来做到的，但是根据所有原则，优先级的原则是不同的。我推动了更多的分析，而与其他原则相比，人们对道德原则的“自主权”更加明确。此外，采访的目的是，护士的护士没有人认识到有关“正义”问题的人。这一点将与美国临床护士牧师不同。另一方面，美国护士遇到了更广泛的道德问题。此外，我认识到练习能力本身是护士牧师的存在，是一种道德强大的存在。 3）问题纸制作：根据提取的内容和优先研究，我设置了我认为在医疗位置真正面对的场景，并制作了虚拟的问题纸。我以“自主权”“福利”“忠实忠诚”“正义”做了包括的原则。较少的