Formation, Development and Transformation of the Modern Law - Comparative Studies of Europe, China and Japan -

现代法的形成、发展与变迁 - 欧洲、中国和日本的比较研究 -

基本信息

批准号：
11620009
负责人：
MIZUBAYASHI Takeshi
金额：
$ 2.37万
依托单位：
Tokyo Metropolitan University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1999
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1999 至 2000
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

Hideo SHINPOU demonstrates that in the absolutism period the nature of the forms of law consists in a diversity of source of law and integration by a monarch, and the purpose of monarchal legislation is found in generalization and direct control over the individual, based on the status system. The early modern times show therefore not only peculiarity as an individual time, but also continuity with modern times.Naoki KANAYAMA point out that the characteristic of the modern law consists in its "civil" nature, and law "civilised" becomes a comprehensive norm, by which people's life is controled in its very details.Seigo HIROWATARI focused on two aspects of the problem "Nationalsocialism and Modernization". How or whether did the Nationalsocialism modernize the German Society? How did the Nationalsocialism attack the keyconcepts of Modern Law and with what did the Nationalsocialism replaced it ? This Analysis showed the interdependent relation between normative and factual aspects of modernization.Hiroaki TERADA pointed out that the Q'ing civil justice have a strong inclination for compromise, and it was not as the result of the static society, but as an another style of the public authority governing the dynamic societyFumio JINBO demonstrated that the modern civil litigation system was not quite different from that of Tokugawa Era, but the base which made it possible to receive modern Western law after Meiji Era has been already formed in the practices of money suits in the Osaka Town Magistrate's Office.

新方秀夫论证了专制主义时期法律形式的本质在于法律渊源的多样性和君主的整合，君主立法的目的在于基于地位的普遍化和对个人的直接控制。系统。因此，近代初期既表现出作为个体时代的特殊性，又表现出与近代的连续性。金山直树指出，现代法律的特征在于其“文明”性质，“文明”的法律成为一种综合规范，广渡诚吾主要关注“国家社会主义与现代化”问题的两个方面。国家社会主义如何或是否使德国社会实现了现代化？国家社会主义如何攻击现代法的关键概念以及用什么取代它？这一分析揭示了现代化的规范性与事实性之间的相互依存关系。寺田弘明指出，清代民事司法具有强烈的妥协倾向，这并不是静态社会的结果，而是另一种形式的司法。神房文雄的公共权力治理动态社会表明，现代民事诉讼制度与德川时代并无太大区别，但明治时代以后接受现代西方法律的基础已经在实践中形成大阪町裁判所的金钱诉讼。