Contrastive Study of Middle Construction in French and Japanese

法语和日语中间结构的对比研究

基本信息

批准号：
08610501
负责人：
HARUKI Yoshitaka
金额：
$ 1.34万
依托单位：
Osaka University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1996
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1996 至 1997
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-08610501/
关键词：
Middle Construction Passive Spontaneity Reflexive Voice Affected Patient Agent 代名動詞ヴォイス(態)受動

项目摘要

In this research, I tried to reconsider the whole reflexive constructions in Modern French in the hope that I would give them a coherent semantic characterisation, which has never been done successfully so far. Reflexive constructions are used in French to express greater involvement or participation of a referent of the subject in the process denoted by the reflexive verb, In the voice system, different from the transitive constructions in which a referent of the subject does something to the 'goal' referent, there is no such transitive flow to another referent from the referent of the subject in reflexive constructions. I do not claim either that there is a circular movement of an act from the subject back to itself. My claim is that the involvement of the subject in reflexive constructions is self-sufficient and that the subject does not eradiate its act from its sphere. The intransitive constructions are also different from the reflexive, because in the former constructions the involvement of the subject does not exist. Even if it does, it is not expressed linguistically.Although many linguists claim that, in the reflexive constructions, a referent of the subject 'is affected'. I do not agree with them. The notion 'being affected' is too vague and not operable. This notion may be useful to explain semantic effects of the reflexive construction but not to explain its function.I am still working on Japanese middle constructions with the special emphasis on the possibility of co-occurrence of the 'NI' (*) case expression as well as the tense in which Japanese 'JIHATSU'(construction with the meaning of spontaneity) can be used.

在这项研究中，我试图重新考虑现代法语中的整个反身结构，希望能给它们一个连贯的语义特征，但迄今为止从未成功完成过。反身结构在法语中用于表达主语所指对象在反身动词所表示的过程中的更多参与或参与，在语音系统中，与及物结构中主语所指对象对“目标”做某事不同' 所指对象，在自反结构中不存在从主语的所指对象到另一个所指对象的传递流。我也不声称存在从主体回到自身的行为的循环运动。我的主张是，主体参与反身性建构是自足的，并且主体不会将其行为从其范围中消除。不及物结构也不同于反身结构，因为在前者结构中不存在主语的参与。即使确实如此，它也不会在语言上得到表达。尽管许多语言学家声称，在反身结构中，主语的所指对象“受到影响”。我不同意他们的观点。 “受影响”这个概念太模糊，不具有可操作性。这个概念可能有助于解释反身结构的语义效果，但不能解释其功能。我仍在研究日语中间结构，特别强调“NI”（*）格表达同时出现的可能性以及可以使用日语“JIHATSU”（具有自发性含义的结构）的时态。