Decision of foreign policy of the Greek poleis and political groups in the classical age

古典时代希腊城邦和政治集团的外交政策决定

基本信息

批准号：
09610396
负责人：
NAKAI Yoshiaki
金额：
$ 1.22万
依托单位：
Doshisha University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1997
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1997 至 1999
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

Purpose : The purpose of this study is to analyze and to extimate influences which political groups had on forming and deciding foreign policy in poleis.Process : The first year (1997). I dealt with the assessment of Aristeides for this study. Many historians are thinking that Aristeides required a light load to allies.. The total of his assessment is lower than 600 talents in the Pericles times. However, it doesn't mean that the load of each ally was light. I think that individual load was heavy. Nevertheless, allies undertook their load aggressively. It was the expression of their expectations to Athens.The 2nd year (1998). I dealt with the Pausanias affair for the study. Pausanias, the regent, has been supposed to betray his city and Greece for his ambition. Secret letters, which were discovered later, have been made to be the evidence of his betrayal. The dialect which used in the letters is not Dorian but Ionian. Therefore, his betrayal was a frame-up. The opponents who feared his growing influence made up his sin and killed him. Athens used it to form her maritime empire aggressively.The last year (1999). I analyzed the rebellion of Lesbos. It was the oligarchs that took the lead in the rebellion. It was the oligarchs that opposed the rebellion and guided the surrender too. There were not the democrats in Mytilene. Demos didn't want revolution and democracy.The Mytilenean demos was not the revolutionary mass.Conclusion : The cold war-model to emphasize the revolutionary situations and the political tensions between the democrats and the oligarchs is not effective to explain many political events in the classical Greece.

目的：这项研究的目的是分析和扩大政治群体在Poleis中制定和决定外交政策的影响。Process：第一年（1997年）。我处理了这项研究的aristeides的评估。许多历史学家认为，阿里斯蒂德（Aristeides）需要对盟友进行轻载。.他的评估总数低于Pericles时代的600人才。但是，这并不意味着每个盟友的负载是轻的。我认为个人负载很重。然而，盟友积极承担负载。这是他们对雅典的期望。第二年（1998年）。我处理了Pausanias事件进行研究。摄政王帕萨尼亚斯（Pausanias）本来应该背叛他的城市和希腊的野心。后来发现的秘密信件被认为是他背叛的证据。字母中使用的方言不是多利安，而是爱奥尼亚人。因此，他的背叛是一个框架。害怕自己影响力不断增长的对手构成了他的罪过并杀死了他。雅典用它积极地形成了她的海洋帝国。去年（1999年）。我分析了Lesbos的叛乱。正是寡头在叛乱中领先。正是寡头反对叛乱，也指导了投降。米蒂伦（Mytilene）没有民主党人。演示不想要革命和民主。米利特里尼人的演示不是革命的群众：强调革命局势和民主党与寡头之间的政治紧张局势的冷战模型对解释古典希腊的许多政治事件并不有效。