A Theoretic and Empirical Research on the Relationship between Criminal Policy and Social Welfare Policy for Criminals

刑事政策与罪犯社会福利政策关系的理论与实证研究

基本信息

批准号：
06620043
负责人：
DOI Masakazu
金额：
$ 1.15万
依托单位：
KYUSHU UNIVERSITY
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1994
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1994 至 1996
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-06620043/
关键词：
HARMFUL EFFECTS OF CONFINEMENT HELP FOR CRIMINALS PETITION TO PAROLE REMAND DETENTION DIVERSION CRIMINAL POLICY SOCIAL WELFARE POLICY REHABILITATION SERVICES 犯罪者援助矯正と保護の相互連携社会的援助司法福祉行刑刑事政策福祉政策犯罪者処遇

项目摘要

1.on paroleI reviewed the justification of people, not from the aspect of criminal policy but from the aspect of social welfare policy. I concluded, prisoners have petitions to parole, because the state has an obligation to eliminate the harmful effects that the confinement has.2.on remand detentionIf the state has an obligation to eliminate the harmful effects, we should first consider the pre-convicted prisoner who receives the presumption of innocence and is separated from his social life. It is essential for him to be helped not only legally but also welfarefully. But until now there are no research about it in japan. I discussed the aid for pre-convicted prisoner from the viewpoint of removing the harmful effects.3.on juvenile lawThe juvenile law includes also the important issues about the relationship between criminal policy and social welfare policy. In particular on diversion I have reviewed the discussion and the proposal about juvenile police in Germany. I point out the contradiction when the criminal justice system has also functions of welfare.4.on rehabilitation servicesRehabilitation services are the most important aspects for the above relationship. "rehabilitation services act 1996" is enforced, but we have still the following problems. (1) There are no consistence between "offenders prevention and rehabilitation law" and "probationary supervision act" and no concrete provisions about cooperation with organs of welfare.(2) There are no provisions about legal status and rights of non-custodial convicts. (3) There are little comparative studies about international rules on the non-custodial sanctions in japan.

1.帕罗利（Parolei）审查了人们的理由，不是从刑事政策方面，而是从社会福利政策的方面。我得出结论，囚犯有假释的请愿书，因为国家有义务消除监禁所具有的有害影响。对他而言，不仅要在法律上得到帮助，而且要有良好的帮助。但是到目前为止，日本还没有关于它的研究。我从消除有害效果的角度讨论了预告囚犯的援助。3.MevenileLaw The少年法还包括有关刑事政策与社会福利政策之间关系的重要问题。特别是在转移方面，我审查了德国少年警察的讨论和提议。我指出的是，当刑事司法系统还具有福利的作用时，矛盾。4。康复服务理所品服务是上述关系的最重要方面。执行了“ 1996年康复服务法”，但我们仍然存在以下问题。（1）“预防罪犯和康复法”与“试用监督法”之间没有任何一致性，也没有关于与福利器官合作的具体规定。（2）没有关于非监护罪犯的法律地位和权利的规定。（3）几乎没有关于日本非监护制裁的国际规则的比较研究。