Studies of the Interaction Between Pictorial Encoding and Verbal Encoding

图像编码与语言编码相互作用的研究

基本信息

批准号：
63510063
负责人：
HAKODA Yuji
金额：
$ 1.22万
依托单位：
Kyushu University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1988
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1988 至 1990
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

In this project, we surveyed the mechanisms underlying Stroop and ReverseーStroop interference from the viewpoint of interaction between pictorial encoding and verbal encoding.First, we produced the group version of Stroop and reverse-Stroop color and word test through the use of a matching method. The test consisted of two control tasks, one Stroop task, and a reverse-Stroop task. In the four experiments, we examined the validity and reliability of the test as follows. Experiment 1 showed the significant amount of Stroop interference similar to traditional oral naming method ; Experiments 2, 3, 4 showed neither order effect of tasks nor practice effect in the Stroop and the reverse-Stroop tasks, together with the high test-retest reliability (r= .695- .824), respectively.Second, we carried out a life-span survey of Stroop interference and Reverse-Stroop interference. Life-span trends of both kinds off interference were examined by giving the group version of Stroop and reverse-Stroop test to the subjects between the ages of 7 and 96. The results indicated that Reverse-Stroop interference has the different lifre-span trend from Stroop interference.Third, we tested the hypothesis that schizophrenics are more susceptive to reverse-Stroop interference than normals. We compared the number of correct response and Stroop and reverse-Stroop intereference rates with the patient's behavior tendency rated by a psychiatrist and a nurse. The results indicated that reverse-Stroop interference was closely related to the patient's impulsiveness control. It was suggested that schizophrenics have generation (or translation) deficits between pictorial and verbal codes.

在这个项目中，我们从绘画编码和言语编码之间的相互作用的角度调查了Stroop和反向互动的机制。首先，我们通过使用匹配方法制作了Stroop的组版本，并通过使用匹配方法进行了逆转颜色和单词测试。该测试包括两个控制任务，一个stroop任务和一个逆转录任务。在四个实验中，我们检查了测试的有效性和可靠性，如下所示。实验1显示了与传统口服命名方法相似的大量stroop干扰。实验2、3、4既不显示任务的顺序效应，也没有在Stroop和逆转录任务中与高测试可靠性（r = .695- .824）一起进行。通过将Stroop的小组版本和逆转录测试对7至96岁之间的受试者进行分组版本进行检查，从而检查了两种干扰的生命趋势。结果表明，反向流动的干扰与Stroop干扰的lifre-Span趋势不同。三分之一，我们证明了精神分裂症的假设是比较敏感的，比不可及差异化。我们比较了正确的反应，stroop和反向互动率的数量与精神科医生和护士评级的患者行为趋势。结果表明，反向突变干扰与患者的冲动控制密切相关。据建议，精神分裂症患者具有生成（或翻译）的定义，并在绘画代码和言语代码之间定义。