Diplomacy and Confession. Religious language in the political communication at the Westphalian Peace Congress (1645–1648)

外交与忏悔。

• 批准号: 511291660
• 负责人: Dr. Marco Stallmann
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Seminar für Kirchengeschichte II (Reformation, Neuere und Neueste Kirchengeschichte)
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 资助国家: 德国
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/511291660?language=en
• 关键词: Diplomacy; Confession.; Religious; language; political

While the peace treaties of Münster and Osnabrück are considered to be among the intensively researched sources of the early modern period, the Congress that preceded them has only received attention in recent diplomatic historiography and cultural-historical peace research. Instead of concentrating on macro-historical figures such as states and rulers, the multi-perspectival approaches increasingly focus on the diplomatic actors on site, which in a striking way also leads to the reception of impulses from neighboring disciplines. However, a theological monograph based on the current state of cultural-historical research has not yet been published to this day. In particular, the genesis of religious law (Art. V and VII IPO) and the role of denominational corpora in the diplomatic negotiations are among the most urgent research desiderata. Against this background, the project reconstructs the negotiations with regard to religious language, biblical references and perception of confessional difference on the basis of relevant congress files in order to make a theological contribution to the historical assessment of the Westphalian Peace Congress. It combines research approaches from the field of cultural history of the political with an integrative understanding of church history that is able to include extra-church realities of Christianity and their secular transformations. On this basis, confessional-political legitimation strategies and religious-ethical concepts of peace can be analyzed in a differentiated manner and understood as contributions to the early modern culture of conflict and peace that made the Westphalian Congress a historical milestone.

虽然穆斯特和奥斯纳布鲁克的和平条约被认为是现代早期的研究来源之一，在恢复史学和文化历史和平研究中以宏观历史的人物（例如国家和统治者），众多的统治者，众多的统治者，众多文化 - 统治者的研究来源。越来越多地关注外交参与者对邻近学科的冲动的接收，但是，基于文化历史研究状态的策展人专着尚未发表。背景是关于宗教语言，圣经的参考和供认差异的背景。政治的文化历史是在此基础上进行的。冲突与和平，使威斯特伐利亚国会成为历史里程碑。