A Comprehensive Study on the Process of Injunction in the Administrative Litigation

行政诉讼中的禁令程序综合研究

• 批准号: 16530025
• 负责人: OKADA Masanori
• 金额: $ 1.09万
• 依托单位: Nanzan University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 2004
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2004 至 2005
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-16530025/
• 关键词: injunction; administrative litigation; prevention of noise; suit for general performance; revised administrative litigation law; public power; civil process and administrative process; suit for prohibition; 差止訴訟; 行政事件訴訟法

(1) On the injunction system in the Japanese administrative litigation law I have published an article "Procedural Provisions in the Revised Administrative Litigation Law and the Right of Access to the Courts" (in THE HOURITSU JIHOU vol. 77 No. 3, 2005). And then my study focused on the concept of exercise of public power, which Japanese courts apply in order to exclude injunctions of civil procedure.(2) On the concept of "exercise of public power", I analyzed firstly its historical basis. Articles on this theme are "Tort Liability of the State in the Establishing Era of the Meiji Constitutional System: State Immunity Discipline and the Concept of Public Power(1)-(5)" (in NANZAN LAW REVIEW from vol. 28, No. 4 to vol. 31 No. 3, 2005-7). I gave already a lecture about an outline of these articles were already in a symposium of the Japan Democratic Scientist Society (Division of Law) and summary of this lecture is the article in the journal of this academic society "Science in Law" No. 37 … More . Secondly I examined the concepts of "GYOUSEI-SHOBUN" and "GYOUSEI-KOUI". Both of them mean "administrative action", which is a typical example of "exercise of public power". As a result of my study, I explicated the difference of historical origin of these concepts (former meant originally "administrative measure") and a cause of today's theoretical confusion, which is brought by identifying these two. In other words, because of this confusion Japanese courts deny a series of action for prevention against plane noise, for no other reason than that an action of this kind neither civil nor administrative action.(3) An article on the injunction system in German law will be also appeared in 2006. I examine in this article into the cases and litigation systems of mandamus proceeding or injunction to permitted establishments or facilities, which should pass the criteria in environmental and town planning acts, to non-permitted, which are exempted from regulatory provisions, and to military installations. On the basis of suggestions of these litigation systems, I will propose theoretical and institutional ideas on procedure, object of suit, and effects of judicial decision : I have pointed out a part of these ideas in the Dokkyo International Forum 2005.In addition to these studies from a viewpoint of comparative law, I prepare a Japanese version of H.-J. KOCH (ed.), "UMWELTRECHT" (2002, Luchterhand), which will be published in 2008.(4) In relation to this study theme I have reviewed decisions of courts. Results of this review are reports in THE HOUGAKU SEMINAR since April 2004. Less

（一）关于日本行政诉讼法中的禁令制度，我曾发表过《行政诉讼法修订中的程序规定与诉诸法院的权利》一文（载于《行政诉讼法》第77卷第3期，2005年）然后我的研究重点是日本法院为了排除民事诉讼禁令而适用的公共权力行使的概念。(2)关于公共权力行使的概念“公权力的行使”，我首先分析了这一主题的文章是《明治立宪时代的国家侵权责任：国家豁免纪律与公权力的概念》(1)-(5)。 ）”（载于 NANZAN LAW REVIEW，第 28 卷第 4 期至第 31 卷第 3 期，2005-7）。我已经做了一个关于这些文章的大纲已经在日本民主科学家协会（法学部）的一次研讨会上发表过，本次讲座的摘要是该学术协会的期刊《法学》第37号上的文章……其次，我检查了“GYOUSEI-SHOBUN”和“GYOUSEI-KOUI”的概念都是“行政行为”，这是“行使公共权力”的典型例子。阐明了这两个概念的历史渊源（前者原意为“行政措施”）的差异，以及通过识别这两个概念而带来的当今理论混乱的原因。换句话说，由于这种混乱，日本法院否认了一系列诉讼。 (3) 德国法律中的禁令制度的文章也将于 2006 年出现。我在本文中考察了案例和诉讼系统的根据这些诉讼制度的建议，我对应通过环境和城市规划法标准的许可机构或设施、不受监管规定约束的非许可机构或设施以及军事设施发出履行职责程序或禁令。关于诉讼程序、诉讼对象和司法判决效果的理论建议和制度构想：我在2005年独协国际论坛上指出了其中的一部分。除了从比较法的角度进行的这些研究之外，我准备了一份日文版H.-J. KOCH (ed.) 的《UMWELTRECHT》（2002 年，Luchterhand），将于 2008 年出版。(4) 关于本研究主题，我审查了法院的判决，本次审查的结果是报告。自 2004 年 4 月起参加 HOUGAKU 研讨会。 更少

项目成果

明治憲法体制確立期における国の不法行為責任(1)

明治宪政制度建立过程中的国家侵权责任（一）

• 发表时间: 2005
• 期刊: 南山法学 28巻4号
• 作者: 岡田正則;岡田正則;岡田 正則
• 通讯作者: 岡田 正則

Legal Protection System for Natural Environment in Germany and Japan : From a Viewpoint of Ccfmparative Law

德国和日本的自然环境法律保护体系:基于比较法的视角

• 发表时间: 2006
• 期刊: The Annual Report of Dokkyo International Exchange Centre No.19

行政処分・行政行為の概念史と行政救済法の課題

行政处分和行政行为的概念史以及行政救济法的挑战

• 发表时间: 2007
• 期刊: 法律時報 79巻9号
• 作者: 尾崎安央;尾崎安央;尾崎安央;尾崎安央;OSAKI Yasuhiro;OSAKI Yasuhiro;OSAKI Yasuhiro;岡田 正則;岡田 正則;岡田 正則
• 通讯作者: 岡田 正則

明治憲法体制確立期における国の不法行為責任(3)

明治宪政制度建立过程中的国家侵权责任（三）

• 发表时间: 2006
• 期刊: 南山法学 30巻1号
• 作者: 尾崎安央;尾崎安央;尾崎安央;尾崎安央;OSAKI Yasuhiro;OSAKI Yasuhiro;OSAKI Yasuhiro;岡田 正則;岡田 正則;岡田 正則;OKADA Masanori;OKADA Masapori;岡田 正則;岡田 正則
• 通讯作者: 岡田 正則

改正行政事件訴訟法の訴訟手続規定と裁判を受ける権利

修改后的行政案件诉讼法的程序规定和审判权

• 发表时间: 2005
• 期刊: 法律時報 77巻3号
• 作者: 岡田正則;岡田正則;岡田 正則;OKADA Masanori;岡田正則;岡田正則;岡田 正則
• 通讯作者: 岡田 正則