A Study of History of Ideas concerning the Antagonism between a Transcendental View and a Naturalistic View in Cognition

先验主义认知观与自然主义认知观对立的思想史研究

基本信息

批准号：
14310005
负责人：
YAMAMOTO Michio
金额：
$ 6.66万
依托单位：
Kobe University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
2002
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2002 至 2004
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

The aim of our plan consists in a study of history of ideas concerning the antagonism between a transcendental view and a naturalistic view in cognition. Philosophers, who are treated in this study, are B.Spinoza, I.Kant, E.Husserll, W.James and G.Deleuze.I.Suzuki investigated the transcendental moment in Spinoza's notion of cause, whose philosophy is usually characterized as naturalistic. M.Yamamoto argued that Kant's transcendental deduction presupposed the preestablished harmony, although Kant aimed to refuse it in his deduction. To avoid this contradiction, according to Yamamoto, Kant must accept the naturalistic reduction of categories or the semantic turn of transcendental deduction. On Husserll discussed T.Matauda against a recent tendency of naturalizing of intention. According D.W.Smith Matsuda attempted to discriminate intention from causal dependency. N.Kazasi surveyed the results of some recent comparative studies between James and Husserll, and attempted to seek a possibility of non-transcendental philosophy by bringing into light the similarities and difference between Jame's radical empiricism as phenomenology without transcendental subjectivity and Husserll's phenomenology. I.Suzuki dealt with the transcendental empiricism in G.Deleuze's philosophy. S.Kita presented a novel method based on mathematical structures of matrix patterans to compare the human memory for recall and recognition, He indicated that difference in cue alone can bring about superiority in performance on recognition compared to recall.

我们计划的目的在于研究有关认知中先验观点和自然主义观点之间对立的思想史。本研究中涉及的哲学家有 B.斯宾诺莎、I.康德、E.胡塞尔、W.詹姆斯和 G.德勒兹。I.铃木研究了斯宾诺莎原因概念中的先验时刻，其哲学通常被描述为自然主义。山本先生认为，康德的先验演绎以预先确定的和谐为前提，尽管康德在演绎中试图拒绝这种和谐。山本认为，为了避免这种矛盾，康德必须接受范畴的自然主义还原或先验演绎的语义转向。胡塞尔讨论了T.Matauda，反对最近的意图自然化趋势。根据 D.W.Smith 的说法，松田试图区分意图与因果依赖性。卡扎西考察了詹姆斯与胡塞尔近期的一些比较研究成果，试图通过揭示詹姆斯作为无先验主体性的现象学的激进经验主义与胡塞尔现象学的异同，寻求非先验哲学的可能性。铃木一探讨了德勒兹哲学中的先验经验主义。 S.Kita提出了一种基于矩阵模式的数学结构来比较人类记忆的回忆和识别的新方法，他指出，与回忆相比，仅线索的差异就可以带来识别性能的优越性。