Revitalization of Less Favored Area & Environmental Resource Conservation under the Import Liberalization

弱势地区振兴

• 批准号: 06451125
• 负责人: KAGATSUME Masaru
• 金额: $ 2.94万
• 依托单位: KYOTO UNIVERSITY
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (B)
• 财政年份: 1994
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1994 至 1995
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-06451125/
• 关键词: Import Liberalization; Less Favored Aress; Environment-Resources Conservation; De-coupling; Land based Farming; Organic Farming; Nitrogen Accumulation; Regional Input-Output Structure; 環境保全; 環境資源; 地域公共投資; 高度情報化; 市場開放; 地域活性化

Japan has accepted the minimum access import of rice at the final agreement of GATT Uruguay Round instead of tariffication. It is shown that trade liberalization is considered to be reasonable in terms of optimal resource allocation but not always best policy in terms of resource environmental issues.Recently the accumulation of nitrogen and phosphorus through food trade has been argued in the food importing countries such as Netherlands and Japan. Also the safety of imported food has been controversial matters. In these points, the effects of food trade Iiberalization has to be evaluated from the multidimensional point of view.The negative effects of trade liberalization has tended to be concentrated in certain areas. As the policy to mitigate these effects, farm income support has become less and less acceptable internationally. In the EU,the de-coupling policy has been adopted. Japan had better to adopt these revised de-coupling policies adjusted to Japanese situation for the farm income support measures.As the revitalization policy in less favored aresas, it is not sufficient to promote the agriculture alone. It is more important to create job opportunity by promoting the secondary and tertially industry such as local resources processing firms, especially agribusiness industry and education industries etc.Moreover, the regional promotion through subsidies to external beneficial effects of agriculture will be more and more important in near future.

日本在Gatt Uruguay轮的最终协议中而不是Tarifficition的最终协议中接受了大米的最低访问进口。结果表明，贸易自由化在最佳资源分配方面被认为是合理的，但在资源环境问题方面并不总是最好的政策。在荷兰等粮食进口国中，氮和磷的积累是通过食品贸易来积累的。和日本。进口食品的安全也是有争议的问题。在这些点中，必须从多维的角度评估食品贸易的影响。贸易自由化的负面影响倾向于集中在某些领域。随着减轻这些影响的政策，在国际上，农场收入支持变得越来越不可接受。在欧盟中，已经采用了解开耦合政策。日本最好采用这些经过修订的去偶联政策，该政策适应了日本的农场收入支持措施。由于较少喜欢的阿雷萨人的振兴政策，仅促进农业就不足以促进农业。通过促进二级和三物业工业（例如当地资源处理公司，尤其是农业综合企业和教育行业等）来创造就业机会，更重要不久的将来。

项目成果

Shigeaki ODA: "Future Prospects & Regional Distrbution of Flower Demand in Kyoto Prefecture" Basic Survey on Wholesale Market Distribution. 15-29 (1996)

小田茂明：“未来展望

Takashi TAKEBE: "Recent Trends of Regional Difference of Agricultural Districts in Japan & Its Factors" The Natural Resource Economic Review. No.2. 56-79 (1996)

Takashi TAKEBE：“日本农业地区区域差异的最新趋势

加賀爪 優: "アジア太平洋地域における食糧貿易と環境資源政策" 東亜. 332号. 79-95 (1995)

Yu Kagatsume：“亚太地区的食品贸易和环境资源政策” Toa No. 332. 79-95 (1995)。

加賀爪 優: "農業経済-ガット合意後の貿易自由化対応に向けて-" 経済セミナー. 第473号. 26-30 (1994)

Yu Kagatsume：“农业经济学-GATT协议后的贸易自由化”经济研讨会第473. 26-30（1994）。

小田滋晃: "農業・農村情報化の意義と問題点" 京都工芸繊維大学繊維学部学術報告. 19. 17-24 (1995)

小田茂明：“农业和农村信息化的意义和问题”京都工业大学纺织科学学院学术报告19. 17-24（1995）。